Power comparison of throughput optimized IC busses

E. Malley, Ariel Salinas, Kareem Ismail, L. Pileggi
{"title":"Power comparison of throughput optimized IC busses","authors":"E. Malley, Ariel Salinas, Kareem Ismail, L. Pileggi","doi":"10.1109/ISVLSI.2003.1183351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally asynchronous bus designs are considered theoretically attractive for saving power. In this work we design and compare asynchronous and synchronous busses in 0.13um and 0.10um technologies based on bus-wires that are optimized for throughput per unit channel area. At high frequency the synchronous data bus wire power exceeds that for the asynchronous design due to the higher latch-repeater power. In contrast, the asynchronous bus control power is greater than the local synchronous clock power until a sufficient number of bus lines share the control line. Based on a reasonable switching activity factor for the lines (e.g. /spl sim/15%), however, a shared control line can be considered as switching continuously for 32 bits or more, while the bus is being utilized. The power benefits of asynchronous, therefore, are questionable for applications such as globally asynchronous locally synchronous (GALS) methodologies. Moreover, the distinction between asynchronous and synchronous is marginal if we further consider a synchronous control line with a local pulse-generation circuit to drive half-latch repeaters in the data bus path.","PeriodicalId":299309,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISVLSI.2003.1183351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Globally asynchronous bus designs are considered theoretically attractive for saving power. In this work we design and compare asynchronous and synchronous busses in 0.13um and 0.10um technologies based on bus-wires that are optimized for throughput per unit channel area. At high frequency the synchronous data bus wire power exceeds that for the asynchronous design due to the higher latch-repeater power. In contrast, the asynchronous bus control power is greater than the local synchronous clock power until a sufficient number of bus lines share the control line. Based on a reasonable switching activity factor for the lines (e.g. /spl sim/15%), however, a shared control line can be considered as switching continuously for 32 bits or more, while the bus is being utilized. The power benefits of asynchronous, therefore, are questionable for applications such as globally asynchronous locally synchronous (GALS) methodologies. Moreover, the distinction between asynchronous and synchronous is marginal if we further consider a synchronous control line with a local pulse-generation circuit to drive half-latch repeaters in the data bus path.
吞吐量优化IC总线的功率比较
全局异步总线设计在理论上被认为具有节省电力的吸引力。在这项工作中,我们设计并比较了0.13um和0.10um技术中的异步和同步总线,这些总线基于针对单位通道面积吞吐量进行优化的总线线。在高频情况下,由于锁存中继器功率较高,同步数据总线线功率超过异步设计线功率。相反,异步总线控制功率大于本地同步时钟功率,直到有足够数量的总线共享控制线。然而,基于线路的合理切换活动因子(例如/spl sim/15%),当总线被利用时,共享控制线可以被视为连续切换32位或更多。因此,对于全局异步本地同步(GALS)方法等应用程序来说,异步的强大优势是值得怀疑的。此外,如果我们进一步考虑同步控制线与本地脉冲产生电路驱动数据总线路径中的半锁存器中继器,那么异步和同步之间的区别是微不足道的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信