Major Powers Rivalries: Analysis of War (Choice or Compulsion)

Zeeshan Ahmad, Ijaz Khalid, Maghfoor Ullah
{"title":"Major Powers Rivalries: Analysis of War (Choice or Compulsion)","authors":"Zeeshan Ahmad, Ijaz Khalid, Maghfoor Ullah","doi":"10.31703/gsssr.2022(vii-iv).02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History is consistent with a pattern of the rise and fall of great empires that have dominated the international landscape, but the last five hundred years have simplified an irrefutable arrangement of the rise and fall of great empires. This study explores the rise of China in a historical context and vindicates the hypothetical and theoretical probability of war by using the Thucydides trap in the transition of power from an existing superpower to emerging power. Our results explore that war between the great powers is not a trap created by structural stresses of the international anarchic system, so war is a rational choice for pursuing the strategic goal.","PeriodicalId":253809,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategic & Securities Studies Review","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategic & Securities Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2022(vii-iv).02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History is consistent with a pattern of the rise and fall of great empires that have dominated the international landscape, but the last five hundred years have simplified an irrefutable arrangement of the rise and fall of great empires. This study explores the rise of China in a historical context and vindicates the hypothetical and theoretical probability of war by using the Thucydides trap in the transition of power from an existing superpower to emerging power. Our results explore that war between the great powers is not a trap created by structural stresses of the international anarchic system, so war is a rational choice for pursuing the strategic goal.
大国对抗:战争分析(选择还是强制)
历史与统治国际格局的大帝国的兴衰模式是一致的,但过去500年已经简化了大帝国兴衰的无可辩驳的安排。本研究在历史背景下探讨了中国的崛起,并利用修昔底德陷阱在现有超级大国向新兴大国的权力过渡中证明了假设和理论的战争可能性。我们的研究结果表明,大国之间的战争不是由国际无政府体系的结构性压力造成的陷阱,因此战争是追求战略目标的理性选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信