{"title":"Same day sputum smear microscopy with an economical destaining step for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis","authors":"T. Chandra, R. Selvaraj, Y. Sharma","doi":"10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.15.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Back ground: Acid fast bacilli (AFB) positivity using modified Ziehl Neelsen (MZN) staining and jar method was studied in sputum samples obtained by spot morning (SM) and same day (SS2) approaches. \nMethods: Three specimens (spot, second spot and morning) were collected in 252 patients, duplicate smears were prepared and stained by MZN staining and jar method. \nResults: Smear positivity was 34 (13.5%) and 33 (13%) for MZN staining and jar method respectively (p>0.99) for the SM approach; and 34 (13.5%) and 32 (12.7%) for MZN staining and jar method (p>0.99) respectively for SS2 approach. \nConclusion: Jar method in view of lesser cost and similar diagnostic yielf can be useful for training purposes.","PeriodicalId":405143,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.15.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Back ground: Acid fast bacilli (AFB) positivity using modified Ziehl Neelsen (MZN) staining and jar method was studied in sputum samples obtained by spot morning (SM) and same day (SS2) approaches.
Methods: Three specimens (spot, second spot and morning) were collected in 252 patients, duplicate smears were prepared and stained by MZN staining and jar method.
Results: Smear positivity was 34 (13.5%) and 33 (13%) for MZN staining and jar method respectively (p>0.99) for the SM approach; and 34 (13.5%) and 32 (12.7%) for MZN staining and jar method (p>0.99) respectively for SS2 approach.
Conclusion: Jar method in view of lesser cost and similar diagnostic yielf can be useful for training purposes.