A. Sicignano, A. Nikitin, D. Yeremin, M. Sandy, E. Goldburt
{"title":"Scan linearity: a hidden factor in SEM magnification calibration","authors":"A. Sicignano, A. Nikitin, D. Yeremin, M. Sandy, E. Goldburt","doi":"10.1117/12.437972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scan linearity of a review (cross-section) Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) has been studied using Nanometrology’s proprietary software and reference samples. Nonlinearity across the field of view was measured at greater than 6.5% before and under 1% after correction by the SEM company’s engineer. The scan non-linearity was measured with precision better than 0.2% across the field of view. This is in spite of the nonuniformity of the reference sample which was measured at greater than 2.5%. The precision of the non-uniformity measurement of the reference sample was better than 0.1%.","PeriodicalId":291028,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Nanostructure Science, Metrology, and Technology","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Nanostructure Science, Metrology, and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.437972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Scan linearity of a review (cross-section) Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) has been studied using Nanometrology’s proprietary software and reference samples. Nonlinearity across the field of view was measured at greater than 6.5% before and under 1% after correction by the SEM company’s engineer. The scan non-linearity was measured with precision better than 0.2% across the field of view. This is in spite of the nonuniformity of the reference sample which was measured at greater than 2.5%. The precision of the non-uniformity measurement of the reference sample was better than 0.1%.