The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert

M. Siems
{"title":"The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert","authors":"M. Siems","doi":"10.1080/14760400903195090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies four different types of interdisciplinary legal research: one basic and three advanced types. Basic interdisciplinary research uses the same questions as starting points as traditional legal research, however, it also considers other academic disciplines in order to answer these questions. Advanced interdisciplinary research goes further: it can either deal with research questions that are not about the law as such (type 1), or incorporate \"scientific methods\" into legal thinking (type 2), or combine both (type 3.) This new taxonomy is useful in order to identify the benefits and difficulties of different types of interdisciplinary legal research.","PeriodicalId":107403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760400903195090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This article identifies four different types of interdisciplinary legal research: one basic and three advanced types. Basic interdisciplinary research uses the same questions as starting points as traditional legal research, however, it also considers other academic disciplines in order to answer these questions. Advanced interdisciplinary research goes further: it can either deal with research questions that are not about the law as such (type 1), or incorporate "scientific methods" into legal thinking (type 2), or combine both (type 3.) This new taxonomy is useful in order to identify the benefits and difficulties of different types of interdisciplinary legal research.
跨学科法律研究的分类学:寻找走出沙漠的道路
本文确定了四种不同类型的跨学科法律研究:一种基本类型和三种高级类型。基础跨学科研究使用与传统法律研究相同的问题作为出发点,然而,它也考虑其他学科来回答这些问题。高级跨学科研究更进一步:它可以处理与法律本身无关的研究问题(类型1),或者将“科学方法”纳入法律思维(类型2),或者将两者结合起来(类型3)。这种新的分类法有助于确定不同类型的跨学科法律研究的好处和困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信