Eetu Heikkilä, T. Malm, J. Sarsama, R. Tiusanen, T. Ahonen
{"title":"Hazard Analysis of an Autonomous Container Handling System – a Comparison of STPA and HAZOP Methods","authors":"Eetu Heikkilä, T. Malm, J. Sarsama, R. Tiusanen, T. Ahonen","doi":"10.26408/125.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing automation is a major trend in container terminals. In automated container handling systems, safety has been previously ensured by segregating the automated machinery from other traffic and workers moving on foot. Currently, further increases in flexibility are sought by developing autonomous systems that are capable of mixed-traffic operations without the need for separate operating areas. This increases the complexity of the systems and introduces new safety hazards. In addition to traditional hazard analysis methods, new approaches are needed to address the emergent risks related to autonomous operations. This paper studies the applicability of the STPA (system-theoretic process analysis) method in hazard analysis of an autonomous machine system. To support the evaluation, we define evaluation categories for comparison of the analysis methods. We also compare STPA with an established method, HAZOP (hazard and operability study). To perform the comparison, both STPA and HAZOP are applied to an autonomous container handling system concept. The study suggests that both STPA and HAZOP are well suited to support the development of autonomous machinery. However, we also highlight some notable differences in the methods, mostly related to the different underlying accident models that they utilise. HAZOP is an established method with tools and standards available. STPA, on the other hand, provides a well-defined syntax to ensure the analysis quality and a system modelling approach that supports the system development.","PeriodicalId":269306,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Gdynia Maritime University","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Gdynia Maritime University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26408/125.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increasing automation is a major trend in container terminals. In automated container handling systems, safety has been previously ensured by segregating the automated machinery from other traffic and workers moving on foot. Currently, further increases in flexibility are sought by developing autonomous systems that are capable of mixed-traffic operations without the need for separate operating areas. This increases the complexity of the systems and introduces new safety hazards. In addition to traditional hazard analysis methods, new approaches are needed to address the emergent risks related to autonomous operations. This paper studies the applicability of the STPA (system-theoretic process analysis) method in hazard analysis of an autonomous machine system. To support the evaluation, we define evaluation categories for comparison of the analysis methods. We also compare STPA with an established method, HAZOP (hazard and operability study). To perform the comparison, both STPA and HAZOP are applied to an autonomous container handling system concept. The study suggests that both STPA and HAZOP are well suited to support the development of autonomous machinery. However, we also highlight some notable differences in the methods, mostly related to the different underlying accident models that they utilise. HAZOP is an established method with tools and standards available. STPA, on the other hand, provides a well-defined syntax to ensure the analysis quality and a system modelling approach that supports the system development.
自动化程度的提高是集装箱码头发展的主要趋势。在自动化集装箱装卸系统中,以前通过将自动化机械与其他交通工具和步行工人隔离来确保安全。目前,为了进一步提高灵活性,需要开发能够混合交通运行的自主系统,而不需要单独的操作区域。这增加了系统的复杂性,并引入了新的安全隐患。除了传统的危害分析方法外,还需要新的方法来解决与自主操作相关的紧急风险。研究了系统理论过程分析(system- theoretical process analysis, STPA)方法在自主机械系统危害分析中的适用性。为了支持评价,我们定义了评价类别,以便对分析方法进行比较。我们还将STPA与已建立的方法HAZOP(危害和可操作性研究)进行了比较。为了进行比较,STPA和HAZOP都应用于自主集装箱装卸系统的概念。研究表明,STPA和HAZOP都非常适合支持自主机械的发展。然而,我们也强调了方法上的一些显著差异,这些差异主要与它们使用的不同的潜在事故模型有关。HAZOP是一种已建立的方法,具有可用的工具和标准。另一方面,STPA提供了定义良好的语法来确保分析质量和支持系统开发的系统建模方法。