Can I Get a Word In? the Impact of Turn-Taking and Gender on Engineering Design Students’ Psychological Safety

Abigail O'Connell, C. Cole, Susan Mohammed, K. Jablokow, Scarlett R. Miller
{"title":"Can I Get a Word In? the Impact of Turn-Taking and Gender on Engineering Design Students’ Psychological Safety","authors":"Abigail O'Connell, C. Cole, Susan Mohammed, K. Jablokow, Scarlett R. Miller","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-90010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Psychological safety and turn-taking have both been listed as key factors needed for collaboration in teams to emerge. Specifically, prior work has shown that increased communication in teams can lead to high psychological safety. Prior work on turn-taking as a measure of communication has mostly focused on its inclusivity in a team rather than its frequency. While the gender composition of the team can impact both participation as well as team psychological safety, there is a lack of research at the individual level. As such, this study provides the first attempt at connecting turn-taking, gender, and psychological safety through the analysis of members of fifteen engineering design student teams during the concept generation stage of their project. Specifically, we gathered video data to study how the number of turns and self-turns in a team impact psychological safety at both the individual and the team levels. We also examined how gender impacts participation and individual perceptions of psychological safety. The results found that turns and self-turns have a significant positive impact on an individual’s perception of the team’s psychological safety. However, no such relationship was found at the team level, indicating that there may be additional underlying factors in team level psychological safety. While we found that gender did not impact individual turn-taking, it did affect an individual’s perception of their psychological safety. These results provide quantitative evidence of the role of team communication on psychological safety.","PeriodicalId":435428,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: 34th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: 34th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychological safety and turn-taking have both been listed as key factors needed for collaboration in teams to emerge. Specifically, prior work has shown that increased communication in teams can lead to high psychological safety. Prior work on turn-taking as a measure of communication has mostly focused on its inclusivity in a team rather than its frequency. While the gender composition of the team can impact both participation as well as team psychological safety, there is a lack of research at the individual level. As such, this study provides the first attempt at connecting turn-taking, gender, and psychological safety through the analysis of members of fifteen engineering design student teams during the concept generation stage of their project. Specifically, we gathered video data to study how the number of turns and self-turns in a team impact psychological safety at both the individual and the team levels. We also examined how gender impacts participation and individual perceptions of psychological safety. The results found that turns and self-turns have a significant positive impact on an individual’s perception of the team’s psychological safety. However, no such relationship was found at the team level, indicating that there may be additional underlying factors in team level psychological safety. While we found that gender did not impact individual turn-taking, it did affect an individual’s perception of their psychological safety. These results provide quantitative evidence of the role of team communication on psychological safety.
我能插句话吗?轮转与性别对工程设计专业学生心理安全的影响
心理安全和轮流都被列为团队协作出现所需的关键因素。具体来说,先前的研究表明,团队中沟通的增加可以带来高度的心理安全感。之前关于轮流作为沟通衡量标准的研究主要集中在其在团队中的包容性,而不是频率。虽然团队的性别构成会影响团队参与和团队心理安全,但缺乏个人层面的研究。因此,本研究通过分析15个工程设计学生团队在项目概念生成阶段的成员,首次尝试将轮作、性别和心理安全联系起来。具体来说,我们收集了视频数据来研究团队中的转弯次数和自我转弯次数如何影响个人和团队层面的心理安全。我们还研究了性别如何影响参与和个人对心理安全的看法。结果发现,转身和自我转身对个体对团队心理安全的感知有显著的正向影响。然而,在团队层面上没有发现这种关系,这表明团队层面的心理安全可能存在其他潜在因素。虽然我们发现性别不会影响个体的轮替,但它确实会影响个体对自己心理安全的感知。这些结果为团队沟通对心理安全的影响提供了定量证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书