A Review of In-situ Temperature Measurements for Additive Manufacturing Technologies

Ryan Murphy
{"title":"A Review of In-situ Temperature Measurements for Additive Manufacturing Technologies","authors":"Ryan Murphy","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2016.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Additive manufacturing (AM) encompasses a rapidly advancing host of technologies used for building parts with complex geometrical shapes layer-by-layer from a wide range of materials such as polymers, glasses, ceramics, metals, and metal-alloys. A wide variety of AM processes are used to build parts on test beds using processes such as material extrusion and laser or e-beam irradiation of powders and liquids, depending on the industrial or commercial application. Unfortunately the dimensional and compositional quality of AM built parts highly depends on the technology, and can even significantly vary between different AM machines of the same technology, due to a lack of process feedback and control. Improvements have been made by performing computational modeling and ex-situ characterization such as x-ray diffraction, focused ion beam cross-sectioning, x-ray computed tomography, and electron microscopy. These techniques, however, are time consuming, expensive, and do not allow in-situ monitoring of parts as they are built. In-situ temperature measurements are promising as they monitor the build temperature and can provide feedback for better process control. Thermal imaging is widely-used for in-situ temperature measurements, but is limited to qualitative data due to the unpredictability of emissivity as temperature and composition dynamically change. Two-color pyrometry and mm-wave radiometry measurements promise to circumvent these problems but have their own dimensional limitations. These methods and others will be compared and contrasted, and future improvements of in-situ temperature measurements will also be discussed. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to adequately describe the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the authors, Sandia National Laboratories, or NCSL International, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are the only or best available for the purpose.","PeriodicalId":162467,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2016","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2016","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2016.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) encompasses a rapidly advancing host of technologies used for building parts with complex geometrical shapes layer-by-layer from a wide range of materials such as polymers, glasses, ceramics, metals, and metal-alloys. A wide variety of AM processes are used to build parts on test beds using processes such as material extrusion and laser or e-beam irradiation of powders and liquids, depending on the industrial or commercial application. Unfortunately the dimensional and compositional quality of AM built parts highly depends on the technology, and can even significantly vary between different AM machines of the same technology, due to a lack of process feedback and control. Improvements have been made by performing computational modeling and ex-situ characterization such as x-ray diffraction, focused ion beam cross-sectioning, x-ray computed tomography, and electron microscopy. These techniques, however, are time consuming, expensive, and do not allow in-situ monitoring of parts as they are built. In-situ temperature measurements are promising as they monitor the build temperature and can provide feedback for better process control. Thermal imaging is widely-used for in-situ temperature measurements, but is limited to qualitative data due to the unpredictability of emissivity as temperature and composition dynamically change. Two-color pyrometry and mm-wave radiometry measurements promise to circumvent these problems but have their own dimensional limitations. These methods and others will be compared and contrasted, and future improvements of in-situ temperature measurements will also be discussed. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to adequately describe the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the authors, Sandia National Laboratories, or NCSL International, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are the only or best available for the purpose.
增材制造技术的原位温度测量综述
增材制造(AM)包含了一系列快速发展的技术,用于从聚合物、玻璃、陶瓷、金属和金属合金等各种材料中逐层构建具有复杂几何形状的零件。根据工业或商业应用,使用材料挤压和粉末和液体的激光或电子束照射等工艺,使用各种AM工艺在试验台上构建零件。不幸的是,增材制造零件的尺寸和组成质量高度依赖于技术,由于缺乏过程反馈和控制,在相同技术的不同增材制造机器之间甚至可能存在显着差异。通过进行计算建模和非原位表征,如x射线衍射、聚焦离子束横截面、x射线计算机断层扫描和电子显微镜,已经取得了改进。然而,这些技术耗时,昂贵,并且不允许在零件建造时进行现场监测。原位温度测量很有前途,因为它们可以监测构建温度,并可以为更好的过程控制提供反馈。热成像广泛应用于原位温度测量,但由于温度和成分的动态变化导致发射率的不可预测性,因此仅限于定性数据。双色热法和毫米波辐射测量有望避免这些问题,但有自己的尺寸限制。本文将对这些方法和其他方法进行比较和对比,并讨论原位温度测量的未来改进。桑迪亚国家实验室是一个多项目实验室,由洛克希德·马丁公司的全资子公司桑迪亚公司管理和运营,根据DE-AC04-94AL85000合同为美国能源部国家核安全管理局服务。为了充分描述实验过程,本文确定了某些商业设备、仪器或材料。这种鉴定并不意味着作者、桑迪亚国家实验室或NCSL国际的推荐或认可,也不意味着鉴定的材料或设备是唯一的或最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信