Perbandingan Aktivitas Ekstrak Etanol Kulit Pisang Kepok Kuning Dengan Ekstrak Etanol Kulit Pisang Kepok Mentah Terhadap Bakteri Salmonella typhi Penyebab Tifus

Andi Nurpati Panaungi, L. Sakka
{"title":"Perbandingan Aktivitas Ekstrak Etanol Kulit Pisang Kepok Kuning Dengan Ekstrak Etanol Kulit Pisang Kepok Mentah Terhadap Bakteri Salmonella typhi Penyebab Tifus","authors":"Andi Nurpati Panaungi, L. Sakka","doi":"10.37311/jsscr.v4i1.13528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has been carried out by testing the antibacterial activity against Salmonella typhi using the diffusion method on NA medium with 3 times replication. Each concentration used was 1.25%, 2.5% and 5.0%. The results obtained show the zone of inhibition around the paper disk with different diameters for each concentration. For raw kapok banana peel with a concentration of 1.25% is 9.82 mm, 2.5% concentration is 10.54 mm and 5.0% concentration is 11.39 mm, while the positive control chloramphenicol is 14.14 mm and the control negative, no inhibition was found and for yellow kapok banana peel with a concentration of 1.25% was 6.67 mm, 2.5% concentration was 7.47 mm, 5.0% concentration was 8.58 and positive control chloramphenicol was 14, 5mm. So it can be concluded that the ethanol extract of raw kepok banana peel (Musa paradisiaca L) has a greater inhibitory power than yellow kapok banana peel (Musa paradisiaca L) against the growth of Salmonella typhi bacteria. It is hoped that further researchers will be able to conduct research on other microbes","PeriodicalId":257265,"journal":{"name":"Journal Syifa Sciences and Clinical Research","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Syifa Sciences and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37311/jsscr.v4i1.13528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has been carried out by testing the antibacterial activity against Salmonella typhi using the diffusion method on NA medium with 3 times replication. Each concentration used was 1.25%, 2.5% and 5.0%. The results obtained show the zone of inhibition around the paper disk with different diameters for each concentration. For raw kapok banana peel with a concentration of 1.25% is 9.82 mm, 2.5% concentration is 10.54 mm and 5.0% concentration is 11.39 mm, while the positive control chloramphenicol is 14.14 mm and the control negative, no inhibition was found and for yellow kapok banana peel with a concentration of 1.25% was 6.67 mm, 2.5% concentration was 7.47 mm, 5.0% concentration was 8.58 and positive control chloramphenicol was 14, 5mm. So it can be concluded that the ethanol extract of raw kepok banana peel (Musa paradisiaca L) has a greater inhibitory power than yellow kapok banana peel (Musa paradisiaca L) against the growth of Salmonella typhi bacteria. It is hoped that further researchers will be able to conduct research on other microbes
将收获黄香蕉皮的乙醇与未收获的香蕉皮乙醇对引起斑疹伤寒的沙门氏菌的活性比较
采用NA培养基上3倍复制的扩散法,对其抑菌活性进行了研究。使用浓度分别为1.25%、2.5%和5.0%。结果表明,在不同浓度的纸圆盘周围存在不同直径的抑制区。对浓度为1.25%的生木棉香蕉皮为9.82 mm, 2.5%浓度为10.54 mm, 5.0%浓度为11.39 mm,阳性对照氯霉素为14.14 mm,对照为阴性,无抑制作用;对浓度为1.25%的黄木棉香蕉皮为6.67 mm, 2.5%浓度为7.47 mm, 5.0%浓度为8.58,阳性对照氯霉素为14.5 mm。由此可见,生木棉香蕉皮乙醇提取物对伤寒沙门氏菌生长的抑制作用强于黄木棉香蕉皮乙醇提取物。希望进一步的研究人员能够对其他微生物进行研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信