Physical and Biological Basis of Proton and of Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy and Clinical Outcome Data

H. Suit, T. Delaney, A. Trofimov
{"title":"Physical and Biological Basis of Proton and of Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy and Clinical Outcome Data","authors":"H. Suit, T. Delaney, A. Trofimov","doi":"10.1142/S179362680900017X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a clear basis in physics for the clinical use of proton and carbon beams in radiation therapy, namely, the finite range of the particle beam. The range is dependent on the beam initial energy, density and atomic composition of tissues along the beam path. Beams can be designed that penetrate to the required depth and deliver a uniform biologically effective dose across the depth of interest. The yield is a superior dose distribution relative to photon beams. There is a potential clinical advantage from the high linear energy transfer (LET) characteristics of carbon beams. This is based on a lower oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) and a flatter age response function. However, due to uncertainties relating OER with relative biological effectiveness (RBE), there is no clinical evidence to date that carbon ion beams have an advantage over proton beams. We strongly support performance Phase III clinical trials of protons vs carbon ion beams designed to feature a single variable, LET. Dose fractionation would be identical in both arms and dose distribution would be similar for the sites to be tested. For sites for which the carbon beam has a demonstrated important advantage in comparative treatment planning due to the narrower penumbra would not be selected for the clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":376234,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S179362680900017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

There is a clear basis in physics for the clinical use of proton and carbon beams in radiation therapy, namely, the finite range of the particle beam. The range is dependent on the beam initial energy, density and atomic composition of tissues along the beam path. Beams can be designed that penetrate to the required depth and deliver a uniform biologically effective dose across the depth of interest. The yield is a superior dose distribution relative to photon beams. There is a potential clinical advantage from the high linear energy transfer (LET) characteristics of carbon beams. This is based on a lower oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) and a flatter age response function. However, due to uncertainties relating OER with relative biological effectiveness (RBE), there is no clinical evidence to date that carbon ion beams have an advantage over proton beams. We strongly support performance Phase III clinical trials of protons vs carbon ion beams designed to feature a single variable, LET. Dose fractionation would be identical in both arms and dose distribution would be similar for the sites to be tested. For sites for which the carbon beam has a demonstrated important advantage in comparative treatment planning due to the narrower penumbra would not be selected for the clinical trials.
质子和碳离子放射治疗的物理生物学基础及临床结果数据
质子和碳束在放射治疗中的临床应用有明确的物理学基础,即粒子束的有限范围。该范围取决于光束的初始能量、密度和沿光束路径的组织的原子组成。光束可以设计成穿透所需的深度,并在感兴趣的深度上提供均匀的生物有效剂量。相对于光子束,产率是一个优越的剂量分布。碳梁的高线性能量传递(LET)特性具有潜在的临床优势。这是基于较低的氧增强比(OER)和较平坦的年龄响应函数。然而,由于OER与相对生物有效性(RBE)之间的不确定性,迄今为止没有临床证据表明碳离子束比质子束有优势。我们强烈支持以单一变量LET为特征的质子与碳离子束的三期临床试验。两臂的剂量分割是相同的,待测地点的剂量分布是相似的。由于较窄的半影带,碳束在比较治疗计划中具有重要优势的部位不会被选择用于临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信