The political economy of water insecurity in Central Asia given the Belt and Road initiative

P. Martens
{"title":"The political economy of water insecurity in Central Asia given the Belt and Road initiative","authors":"P. Martens","doi":"10.29258/CAJWR/2018-RI.V4-1/79-94.ENG","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central Asia is an integral part of the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative and the management of water resources is a critical issue in the region. Recently China has become more active in pursuing its economic and political interests in the Eurasian landmass and its expansionist drive has received much attention in the academic literature, which informs this article. The success or failure of the B&R is intertwined with the political economy of water in Central Asia and the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the central importance of water, given the recent history, to such an ambitious economic initiative. The design of the paper is to firstly to traverse the literature and academic debate on Chinese motives and intentions and how they can impact on upstream and downstream water issues. Then water issues and water governance will be examined considering particularly available evidence of Chinese project experiences in B&R countries, the inter-country geo-political situation in Central Asia and the recent history of environmentally rooted conflict in the region. The methodology broadly follows a systems approach, meaning that understanding is obtained by giving attention to the interacting sub-systems: the political, economic, geographical, social and environmental factors in the context of recent history and the literature on Chinese intentions and motivations. The main conclusions are that the B&R initiative, while offering economic development promise, contains inherent risks of conflict and project failure, particularly in the context of existing and potential water conflicts. Improved trans-boundary governance – especially regarding trans-boundary river systems, stakeholder engagement and effective project management will be required. It is intended that the arguments will resonate with decision-makers and project designers.","PeriodicalId":177314,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Journal of Water Research","volume":"277 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Journal of Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29258/CAJWR/2018-RI.V4-1/79-94.ENG","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Central Asia is an integral part of the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative and the management of water resources is a critical issue in the region. Recently China has become more active in pursuing its economic and political interests in the Eurasian landmass and its expansionist drive has received much attention in the academic literature, which informs this article. The success or failure of the B&R is intertwined with the political economy of water in Central Asia and the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the central importance of water, given the recent history, to such an ambitious economic initiative. The design of the paper is to firstly to traverse the literature and academic debate on Chinese motives and intentions and how they can impact on upstream and downstream water issues. Then water issues and water governance will be examined considering particularly available evidence of Chinese project experiences in B&R countries, the inter-country geo-political situation in Central Asia and the recent history of environmentally rooted conflict in the region. The methodology broadly follows a systems approach, meaning that understanding is obtained by giving attention to the interacting sub-systems: the political, economic, geographical, social and environmental factors in the context of recent history and the literature on Chinese intentions and motivations. The main conclusions are that the B&R initiative, while offering economic development promise, contains inherent risks of conflict and project failure, particularly in the context of existing and potential water conflicts. Improved trans-boundary governance – especially regarding trans-boundary river systems, stakeholder engagement and effective project management will be required. It is intended that the arguments will resonate with decision-makers and project designers.
基于“一带一路”倡议的中亚水不安全的政治经济学
中亚是“一带一路”倡议的重要组成部分,水资源管理是该地区的关键问题。最近,中国在追求其在欧亚大陆的经济和政治利益方面变得更加积极,其扩张主义动力在学术文献中受到了广泛关注,这为本文提供了信息。“一带一路”的成功或失败与中亚水的政治经济交织在一起,本文的目的是展示水的核心重要性,考虑到最近的历史,这是一个雄心勃勃的经济倡议。本文的设计首先是梳理关于中国动机和意图的文献和学术辩论,以及它们如何影响上游和下游的水问题。然后,将特别考虑中国在“一带一路”国家的项目经验、中亚国家间的地缘政治局势以及该地区近期环境冲突的历史,对水问题和水治理进行研究。该方法大致遵循系统方法,这意味着通过关注相互作用的子系统来获得理解:近代历史背景下的政治、经济、地理、社会和环境因素以及有关中国意图和动机的文献。主要结论是,“一带一路”倡议虽然带来了经济发展的希望,但也存在冲突和项目失败的内在风险,特别是在现有和潜在的水资源冲突的背景下。需要改善跨界治理,特别是跨界河流系统、利益相关者参与和有效的项目管理。它的目的是争论将引起决策者和项目设计者的共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信