Czym skorupka za młodu nasiąk(ł)a? Kadrowcy politologii i kształcenie jej studentów w Polsce

Marek Jarentowski
{"title":"Czym skorupka za młodu nasiąk(ł)a? Kadrowcy politologii i kształcenie jej studentów w Polsce","authors":"Marek Jarentowski","doi":"10.33896/spolit.2023.67.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polish political science is accused of not being as global as Polish sociology, or of not taking the scientific method and scientific theory very seriously. In contrast to the three basic social sciences (psychology, economics and sociology), political science is more limited to description and humanistic interpretation. One may ask why Polish political science, as it results from the above accusations, deviates slightly from the positivist pattern. The hypothesis suggests that this may be related to the education of the founders, the first managers of political science (directors of institutes, representatives of political science in the Central Commission of Scientific Degree). As it turns out, they were mostly lawyers, and to some extent historians. Graduates of basic social sciences were rare. Political science also lacks (considering textbooks) influential methodologists. As a consequence, there are fewer social methodological subjects in political science studies than in the other aforementioned fields of study.","PeriodicalId":357105,"journal":{"name":"Studia Politologiczne","volume":"196 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Politologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33896/spolit.2023.67.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polish political science is accused of not being as global as Polish sociology, or of not taking the scientific method and scientific theory very seriously. In contrast to the three basic social sciences (psychology, economics and sociology), political science is more limited to description and humanistic interpretation. One may ask why Polish political science, as it results from the above accusations, deviates slightly from the positivist pattern. The hypothesis suggests that this may be related to the education of the founders, the first managers of political science (directors of institutes, representatives of political science in the Central Commission of Scientific Degree). As it turns out, they were mostly lawyers, and to some extent historians. Graduates of basic social sciences were rare. Political science also lacks (considering textbooks) influential methodologists. As a consequence, there are fewer social methodological subjects in political science studies than in the other aforementioned fields of study.
波兰政治学被指责不像波兰社会学那样具有全球性,或者不认真对待科学方法和科学理论。与三大基础社会科学(心理学、经济学和社会学)相比,政治学更局限于描述和人文主义解释。有人可能会问,为什么波兰的政治科学,作为上述指责的结果,稍微偏离实证主义模式。这一假设表明,这可能与政治学的创始人、第一批管理者(研究所所长、中央科学学位委员会政治学代表)的教育有关。事实证明,他们大多是律师,在某种程度上也是历史学家。基础社会科学专业的毕业生很少。政治学也缺乏有影响力的方法学家(考虑到教科书)。因此,政治科学研究中的社会方法论科目比上述其他研究领域少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信