Canopy structure on forest lands in western Oregon: differences among forest types and stand ages.

Anne C.S. McIntosh, Andrew N. Gray, S. Garman
{"title":"Canopy structure on forest lands in western Oregon: differences among forest types and stand ages.","authors":"Anne C.S. McIntosh, Andrew N. Gray, S. Garman","doi":"10.2737/PNW-GTR-794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canopy structure is an important attribute affecting economic and ecological values of forests in the Pacific Northwest. However, canopy cover and vertical layering are rarely measured directly; they are usually inferred from other forest measurements. In this study, we quantified and compared vertical and horizontal patterns of tree canopy structure and understory cover along a successional gradient of forests and among stands with different thinning histories on nonfederal lands in western Oregon. Analyses focused on three dominant forest type groups: wet conifer, wet hardwood, and dry hardwood. We used data from 917 systematically located, forested Forest Inventory and Analysis plots measured between 1995 and 1997. On each plot, canopy cover by layer and species was measured online-intercept transects, and cover of understory species was measured on five subplots. Trends in canopy structure with stand age did not always follow the patterns predicted by common successional models. Most of the cover in moist stands was in the upper tree layer, but cover in dry hardwood stands was more evenly distributed among layers. Contrary to expectations of canopy closure, mean canopy cover by age class rarely exceeded 85 percent, even in unthinned productive young conifer forests. Possibly as a result, effects of stand age on understory vegetation were minimal, except for low levels of forbs found in 20-to 40-year-old wet conifer stands. Shade-tolerant tree species rarely made up more than 20 percent of canopy cover, even in the lower canopy layers and in stands >100 years old. Although heavily thinned stands had lower total cover, canopy structure did not differ dramatically between thinned and unthinned stands. Our findings suggest potential limitations of simple stand succession models that may not account for the range of forest types, site conditions, and developmental mechanisms found across western Oregon.","PeriodicalId":282363,"journal":{"name":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Canopy structure is an important attribute affecting economic and ecological values of forests in the Pacific Northwest. However, canopy cover and vertical layering are rarely measured directly; they are usually inferred from other forest measurements. In this study, we quantified and compared vertical and horizontal patterns of tree canopy structure and understory cover along a successional gradient of forests and among stands with different thinning histories on nonfederal lands in western Oregon. Analyses focused on three dominant forest type groups: wet conifer, wet hardwood, and dry hardwood. We used data from 917 systematically located, forested Forest Inventory and Analysis plots measured between 1995 and 1997. On each plot, canopy cover by layer and species was measured online-intercept transects, and cover of understory species was measured on five subplots. Trends in canopy structure with stand age did not always follow the patterns predicted by common successional models. Most of the cover in moist stands was in the upper tree layer, but cover in dry hardwood stands was more evenly distributed among layers. Contrary to expectations of canopy closure, mean canopy cover by age class rarely exceeded 85 percent, even in unthinned productive young conifer forests. Possibly as a result, effects of stand age on understory vegetation were minimal, except for low levels of forbs found in 20-to 40-year-old wet conifer stands. Shade-tolerant tree species rarely made up more than 20 percent of canopy cover, even in the lower canopy layers and in stands >100 years old. Although heavily thinned stands had lower total cover, canopy structure did not differ dramatically between thinned and unthinned stands. Our findings suggest potential limitations of simple stand succession models that may not account for the range of forest types, site conditions, and developmental mechanisms found across western Oregon.
俄勒冈西部林地的冠层结构:森林类型和林龄的差异。
冠层结构是影响西北太平洋地区森林经济和生态价值的重要属性。然而,很少直接测量冠层盖度和垂直分层;它们通常是从其他森林测量中推断出来的。在本研究中,我们量化并比较了俄勒冈州西部非联邦土地上沿森林演替梯度和不同间伐史林分的树冠结构和林下覆盖的垂直和水平格局。分析集中在三个主要的森林类型群:湿针叶林、湿硬木和干硬木。我们使用了1995年至1997年间917个系统定位的森林清查和分析样地的数据。在每个样地上,在线截距样地测量了各层和物种的冠层盖度,并在5个样地上测量了林下物种的盖度。林龄变化对林冠结构的影响并不完全符合常用演替模型的预测模式。湿润林分覆盖层主要分布在乔木上层,而干阔叶林层间覆盖层分布较为均匀。与预期的冠层闭合相反,按年龄分类的平均冠层覆盖度很少超过85%,即使在未稀疏的生产性幼针叶林中也是如此。可能由于这个原因,林龄对林下植被的影响很小,除了在20- 40年的湿针叶林中发现了少量的forbs。耐阴树种很少占冠层盖度的20%以上,即使在冠层下层和树龄>100年的林分中也是如此。虽然重度间伐林分的总盖度较低,但林冠结构在间伐林分与未间伐林分之间差异不显著。我们的研究结果表明,简单的林分演替模型可能存在潜在的局限性,这些模型可能无法解释俄勒冈州西部森林类型、立地条件和发育机制的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信