Strict Id Laws Don't Stop Voters: Evidence from a U.S. Nationwide Panel, 2008–2018

Enrico Cantoni, V. Pons
{"title":"Strict Id Laws Don't Stop Voters: Evidence from a U.S. Nationwide Panel, 2008–2018","authors":"Enrico Cantoni, V. Pons","doi":"10.3386/w25522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"U.S. states increasingly require identification to vote – an ostensive attempt to deter fraud that prompts complaints of selective disenfranchisement. Using a difference-in-differences design on a 1.3-billion-observations panel, we find the laws have no negative effect on registration or turnout, overall or for any group defined by race, gender, age, or party affiliation. These results hold through a large number of specifications and cannot be attributed to mobilization against the laws, measured by campaign contributions and self-reported political engagement. ID requirements have no effect on fraud either – actual or perceived. Overall, our results suggest that efforts to reform voter ID laws may not have much impact on elections.","PeriodicalId":396883,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Voters & Elections (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Voters & Elections (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w25522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

U.S. states increasingly require identification to vote – an ostensive attempt to deter fraud that prompts complaints of selective disenfranchisement. Using a difference-in-differences design on a 1.3-billion-observations panel, we find the laws have no negative effect on registration or turnout, overall or for any group defined by race, gender, age, or party affiliation. These results hold through a large number of specifications and cannot be attributed to mobilization against the laws, measured by campaign contributions and self-reported political engagement. ID requirements have no effect on fraud either – actual or perceived. Overall, our results suggest that efforts to reform voter ID laws may not have much impact on elections.
严格的身份法律不能阻止选民:来自美国全国小组的证据,2008-2018
美国各州越来越多地要求选民有身份证明,这是一种防止欺诈的公然尝试,引发了人们对选择性剥夺公民权的抱怨。在13亿观察小组中使用差异中差异设计,我们发现法律对登记或投票率没有负面影响,总体上或对任何由种族,性别,年龄或党派定义的群体。这些结果通过大量的规范来维持,不能归因于反对法律的动员,以竞选捐款和自我报告的政治参与来衡量。身份要求对欺诈也没有影响——无论是实际的还是感知到的。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,改革选民身份法的努力可能不会对选举产生太大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书