War Studies University Attempt to Design Thinking

Ltc Piotr Harężlak, Robert Rosa Maj. M.Sc
{"title":"War Studies University Attempt\nto Design Thinking","authors":"Ltc Piotr Harężlak, Robert Rosa Maj. M.Sc","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.5769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the process of recognising and acquiring new capabilities in\nthe frame of operational planning process. It refers to the changes in the operational\nenvironment which can be observed nowadays. Educating senior officers is\na process which requires proper tools, techniques, methods and approach. War Studies\nUniversity tries to respond to these appearing needs in the field of operational planning\nprocess, especially in understanding the operational environment. The article looks at\nthe elements of this process. Implementing the design thinking may possibly be an\noffer that has to be tested. A general overview of the testing model is the aim of the\nsecond part of this article. A description of the experimental model includes control\nand experimental group, dependent and independent variables. Additionally, selected\ntools are presented. The conduct of the pilot research to verify methods and the way\nof conducting the experiment is also predicted. The article also refers to the problems\nof cultural adaptation of the scenario. First of all, the scenario has to be of complex\ncontext. This is the consequence of used typology of the operational environment. In\nthe Cynefin framework, environment is divided into four types: simple, complicated,\ncomplex and chaotic. The article underlines the meaning of the research concerning\nthe design thinking, as a divergent approach, in the process of implementing this into\noperational planning.\n\n","PeriodicalId":333283,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Sztuki Wojennej","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Sztuki Wojennej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article describes the process of recognising and acquiring new capabilities in the frame of operational planning process. It refers to the changes in the operational environment which can be observed nowadays. Educating senior officers is a process which requires proper tools, techniques, methods and approach. War Studies University tries to respond to these appearing needs in the field of operational planning process, especially in understanding the operational environment. The article looks at the elements of this process. Implementing the design thinking may possibly be an offer that has to be tested. A general overview of the testing model is the aim of the second part of this article. A description of the experimental model includes control and experimental group, dependent and independent variables. Additionally, selected tools are presented. The conduct of the pilot research to verify methods and the way of conducting the experiment is also predicted. The article also refers to the problems of cultural adaptation of the scenario. First of all, the scenario has to be of complex context. This is the consequence of used typology of the operational environment. In the Cynefin framework, environment is divided into four types: simple, complicated, complex and chaotic. The article underlines the meaning of the research concerning the design thinking, as a divergent approach, in the process of implementing this into operational planning.
战争研究大学尝试设计思维
本文描述了在业务规划过程框架中识别和获取新能力的过程。它指的是现在可以观察到的操作环境的变化。教育高级人员是一个过程,需要适当的工具、技巧、方法和途径。战争研究大学试图回应这些在作战计划过程领域出现的需求,特别是在了解作战环境方面。本文将探讨这一过程的要素。实现设计思维可能是一个需要测试的提议。本文第二部分的目的是对测试模型进行总体概述。实验模型的描述包括对照组、实验组、因变量和自变量。此外,还介绍了选定的工具。对验证方法和实验方法的试点研究进行了预测。文章还提到了情景的文化适应问题。首先,场景必须具有复杂的上下文。这是使用操作环境类型的结果。在Cynefin框架中,环境分为简单、复杂、复杂和混乱四种类型。文章强调了设计思维作为一种发散性的思维方式,在将其应用于运营规划的过程中所具有的研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信