FULFILLMENT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF AN OPEN TRIAL IN AN ELECTRONIC TRIAL

SOL JUSTICIA Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI:10.54816/sj.v5i1.468
V. Setyawan
{"title":"FULFILLMENT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF AN OPEN TRIAL IN AN ELECTRONIC TRIAL","authors":"V. Setyawan","doi":"10.54816/sj.v5i1.468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nWriting this article will discuss the problems related to the implementation of electronic trials in the answer-and-responsibility agenda (oral-debate) and the agenda for reading decisions that do not realize the principle of an open trial. These problems make it difficult for the public to know the course of criminal case investigations in court. The research and writing of this article aims to understand the holding of electronic trials that are open to the public, and to find out the problems in the form of barriers to public access to obtaining information about court decisions. The writing of this article uses a normative research method, with a conceptual and statutory approach. The legal materials used in writing this article are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. \nKeywords: Electronic Trial, Trial Open to the Public, Court Verdict.","PeriodicalId":197876,"journal":{"name":"SOL JUSTICIA","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOL JUSTICIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54816/sj.v5i1.468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Writing this article will discuss the problems related to the implementation of electronic trials in the answer-and-responsibility agenda (oral-debate) and the agenda for reading decisions that do not realize the principle of an open trial. These problems make it difficult for the public to know the course of criminal case investigations in court. The research and writing of this article aims to understand the holding of electronic trials that are open to the public, and to find out the problems in the form of barriers to public access to obtaining information about court decisions. The writing of this article uses a normative research method, with a conceptual and statutory approach. The legal materials used in writing this article are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Keywords: Electronic Trial, Trial Open to the Public, Court Verdict.
电子审判中公开审判原则的实现
摘要本文将探讨在没有实现公开审判原则的答辩与责任议程(口头辩论)和判决书议程中实施电子审判的相关问题。这些问题使公众难以了解法院刑事案件的调查过程。本文的研究和写作旨在了解对公众开放的电子审判的举行,并找出公众获取法院判决信息的障碍形式存在的问题。本文的写作采用了规范研究的方法,具有概念和法定的方法。撰写本文所使用的法律资料分为一级法律资料和二级法律资料。关键词:电子审判,公开审判,法院判决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信