Advance care planning

J. Rietjens, I. Korfage, J. Seymour
{"title":"Advance care planning","authors":"J. Rietjens, I. Korfage, J. Seymour","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advance care planning (ACP) enables individuals to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these goals and preferences with family and healthcare providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate. ACP interventions have potentially beneficial outcomes for patients and healthcare systems, including increased completion of advance care directives, alignment of care to expressed preferences, better quality of communication and improved quality of life, reduction of unwanted hospital admissions, and increased use of palliative care. Aspects of ACP have been adopted in national and international healthcare policy. However, due to barriers to ACP, the occurrence in practice remains low. For instance, some people find ACP challenging: they may neither wish to ‘foresee’ the future nor to discuss the implications of their illness. Some may find it difficult to express their wishes or find the emphasis on autonomy to be countercultural. This chapter examines evidence about the effectiveness of ACP, describes the current practices, analyses its barriers and facilitators, and formulates best practices. It also explores the challenges of raising awareness of ACP among the general public, which is a necessary precursor to ACP. It draws on an international Delphi consensus study that was charged with developing a definition of ACP and recommendations for its application.","PeriodicalId":369448,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) enables individuals to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these goals and preferences with family and healthcare providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate. ACP interventions have potentially beneficial outcomes for patients and healthcare systems, including increased completion of advance care directives, alignment of care to expressed preferences, better quality of communication and improved quality of life, reduction of unwanted hospital admissions, and increased use of palliative care. Aspects of ACP have been adopted in national and international healthcare policy. However, due to barriers to ACP, the occurrence in practice remains low. For instance, some people find ACP challenging: they may neither wish to ‘foresee’ the future nor to discuss the implications of their illness. Some may find it difficult to express their wishes or find the emphasis on autonomy to be countercultural. This chapter examines evidence about the effectiveness of ACP, describes the current practices, analyses its barriers and facilitators, and formulates best practices. It also explores the challenges of raising awareness of ACP among the general public, which is a necessary precursor to ACP. It draws on an international Delphi consensus study that was charged with developing a definition of ACP and recommendations for its application.
预先护理计划
预先护理计划(ACP)使个人能够确定未来医疗和护理的目标和偏好,与家人和医疗保健提供者讨论这些目标和偏好,并在适当的情况下记录和审查这些偏好。ACP干预措施对患者和医疗保健系统具有潜在的有益结果,包括提高预先护理指示的完成程度,使护理与表达的偏好保持一致,提高沟通质量和改善生活质量,减少不必要的住院率,增加姑息治疗的使用。国家和国际保健政策采纳了《非加太计划》的各个方面。然而,由于ACP的障碍,实践中的发生率仍然很低。例如,有些人觉得ACP具有挑战性:他们可能既不想“预见”未来,也不想讨论自己疾病的影响。有些人可能会觉得很难表达自己的愿望,或者觉得强调自主是反文化的。本章考察了ACP有效性的证据,描述了当前的实践,分析了其障碍和促进因素,并制定了最佳实践。它还探讨了提高公众对非加太的认识所面临的挑战,这是非加太的必要前提。它借鉴了一项国际德尔菲共识研究,该研究负责制定ACP的定义及其应用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信