Instructional Quality Assessment Criteria for MOOCs

F. Seraji
{"title":"Instructional Quality Assessment Criteria for MOOCs","authors":"F. Seraji","doi":"10.1109/ICELET46946.2019.9091672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MOOCs (massive open online courses) have recently garnered the attention of education authorities, policymakers, and planners. MOOCs have opened up new horizons for higher education, lifelong learning, and professional development because of being open, online, and massive and for facilitating access to education. However, there are major challenges to the quality of instruction provided by MOOCs. The present research was, therefore, an attempt to identify the criteria for the assessment of MOOCs. To this end, first the systematic review approach was used with several keywords namely \"MOOC education quality\", \"MOOC success factors\", and \"MOOC opportunities\" to search the Science Direct, Springer, Wiley, Google Scholar, and ERIC databases for three months. After filtering the retrieved references by title, abstract, and body, 19 valid articles were selected for the analysis and the criteria for the quality assessment of MOOCs were extracted. In the second research phase, the identified criteria were presented to 20 experts using the Delphi method and the data was analyzed using the agreement coefficients. According to the results, the experts agreed on 20 criteria which could be classified into three categories: 1) learning resources and content quality and accessibility, 2) diversity and proportionality of the learning activities, and 3) the learners' support system. Accordingly, the social context, organizational policies, and technologies are the three factors that interact with the educational elements to determine the quality of MOOCs. Suggestions are also provided in this research for future designers, producers, and researchers based on the research findings.","PeriodicalId":278081,"journal":{"name":"2019 13th Iranian and 7th National Conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching (ICeLeT)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 13th Iranian and 7th National Conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching (ICeLeT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELET46946.2019.9091672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

MOOCs (massive open online courses) have recently garnered the attention of education authorities, policymakers, and planners. MOOCs have opened up new horizons for higher education, lifelong learning, and professional development because of being open, online, and massive and for facilitating access to education. However, there are major challenges to the quality of instruction provided by MOOCs. The present research was, therefore, an attempt to identify the criteria for the assessment of MOOCs. To this end, first the systematic review approach was used with several keywords namely "MOOC education quality", "MOOC success factors", and "MOOC opportunities" to search the Science Direct, Springer, Wiley, Google Scholar, and ERIC databases for three months. After filtering the retrieved references by title, abstract, and body, 19 valid articles were selected for the analysis and the criteria for the quality assessment of MOOCs were extracted. In the second research phase, the identified criteria were presented to 20 experts using the Delphi method and the data was analyzed using the agreement coefficients. According to the results, the experts agreed on 20 criteria which could be classified into three categories: 1) learning resources and content quality and accessibility, 2) diversity and proportionality of the learning activities, and 3) the learners' support system. Accordingly, the social context, organizational policies, and technologies are the three factors that interact with the educational elements to determine the quality of MOOCs. Suggestions are also provided in this research for future designers, producers, and researchers based on the research findings.
mooc教学质量评估标准
mooc(大规模在线开放课程)最近引起了教育当局、政策制定者和规划者的关注。mooc以其开放、在线、大规模的特点,为高等教育、终身学习和职业发展开辟了新的视野,并促进了接受教育的机会。然而,mooc提供的教学质量面临着重大挑战。因此,本研究试图确定mooc的评估标准。为此,首先采用系统综述的方法,以“MOOC教育质量”、“MOOC成功因素”、“MOOC机会”几个关键词,对Science Direct、Springer、Wiley、Google Scholar、ERIC数据库进行了为期三个月的检索。对检索到的文献按标题、摘要、正文进行筛选后,筛选出19篇有效文献进行分析,提取mooc质量评价标准。在第二阶段的研究中,采用德尔菲法将确定的标准提交给20位专家,并使用一致系数对数据进行分析。根据结果,专家们达成了20项标准,这些标准可分为三类:1)学习资源和内容的质量和可及性;2)学习活动的多样性和比例性;3)学习者支持系统。因此,社会环境、组织政策和技术是与教育要素相互作用决定mooc质量的三个因素。根据研究结果,本研究也对未来的设计师、制作人和研究者提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信