Teologia jako wiedza praktyczna

Edward Sienkiewicz
{"title":"Teologia jako wiedza praktyczna","authors":"Edward Sienkiewicz","doi":"10.15290/std.2020.06.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regardless of the solutions to the problem posed in this way, at least one is beyond discussion: in the practical dimension of systematic reflection of faith, it is about knowledge. Besides, it is theology that is the most appropriate way to defend knowledge against one-sided and partial approaches. It is determined by two issues that constitute an interpretative key in solving the problem posed: sense and context, as well as – in this perspective – two dimensions: cognition and free will. Therefore, in order to define the nature and importance of theology as practical knowledge, the problem of utilitarianism in science as such must first be solved. The turning point here is the Marxist appreciation of revolutionary praxis, which gives philosophy a new and practical meaning. It posed a particular challenge to theology and the objective nature of truth as a fundamental question in science. Both the Bible and the Christian systematic reflection of faith developed over the centuries clearly show that faith in Almighty God has a practical character. This means that faith cannot be reduced to knowledge only, just as faith cannot give up the problem of truth. In this sense, theology as practical knowledge, that is, on the basis of faith, a specific spiritual attitude and the choices that flow from it, is a proper understanding of the necessary participation of human reason, revelation and life in this event. From a Christological perspective, the best definition of theology as practical knowledge are the words from John’s Gospel: “I am the way, the truth and the life” (Jn 14: 6). In such an approach, the practical dimension of reflection on faith is simply love – first as the perfect fulfillment of the Law (Rom 13:10), and then as caritas, that is, a gift that does not retreat from renunciation and suffering. This means the necessity in this problem of the revealed truth about the Holy Trinity, in which the relationships of giving and accepting in love are difficult to consider theoretically. Just as practical and theoretical knowledge should not be opposed, knowledge and wisdom should not be confronted or separated. For theology, as wisdom, not only knows, but also knows why it knows and what to do with what it knows; not only poses the question of how to live, but also answers them. In other words, the practical dimension of systematic reflection of faith is essential for theology to be not only debatable, but also kneeling and working.","PeriodicalId":145380,"journal":{"name":"Studia Teologii Dogmatycznej","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Teologii Dogmatycznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/std.2020.06.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regardless of the solutions to the problem posed in this way, at least one is beyond discussion: in the practical dimension of systematic reflection of faith, it is about knowledge. Besides, it is theology that is the most appropriate way to defend knowledge against one-sided and partial approaches. It is determined by two issues that constitute an interpretative key in solving the problem posed: sense and context, as well as – in this perspective – two dimensions: cognition and free will. Therefore, in order to define the nature and importance of theology as practical knowledge, the problem of utilitarianism in science as such must first be solved. The turning point here is the Marxist appreciation of revolutionary praxis, which gives philosophy a new and practical meaning. It posed a particular challenge to theology and the objective nature of truth as a fundamental question in science. Both the Bible and the Christian systematic reflection of faith developed over the centuries clearly show that faith in Almighty God has a practical character. This means that faith cannot be reduced to knowledge only, just as faith cannot give up the problem of truth. In this sense, theology as practical knowledge, that is, on the basis of faith, a specific spiritual attitude and the choices that flow from it, is a proper understanding of the necessary participation of human reason, revelation and life in this event. From a Christological perspective, the best definition of theology as practical knowledge are the words from John’s Gospel: “I am the way, the truth and the life” (Jn 14: 6). In such an approach, the practical dimension of reflection on faith is simply love – first as the perfect fulfillment of the Law (Rom 13:10), and then as caritas, that is, a gift that does not retreat from renunciation and suffering. This means the necessity in this problem of the revealed truth about the Holy Trinity, in which the relationships of giving and accepting in love are difficult to consider theoretically. Just as practical and theoretical knowledge should not be opposed, knowledge and wisdom should not be confronted or separated. For theology, as wisdom, not only knows, but also knows why it knows and what to do with what it knows; not only poses the question of how to live, but also answers them. In other words, the practical dimension of systematic reflection of faith is essential for theology to be not only debatable, but also kneeling and working.
不管以这种方式提出的问题的解决方案是什么,至少有一个是不容讨论的:在系统反思信仰的实践维度上,它是关于知识的。此外,神学是最合适的方式来捍卫知识,反对片面和片面的方法。它是由两个问题决定的,这两个问题构成了解决所提出问题的解释性关键:感觉和语境,以及——从这个角度来看——两个维度:认知和自由意志。因此,要明确神学作为实践知识的性质和重要性,首先必须解决科学本身的功利主义问题。这里的转折点是马克思主义对革命实践的认识,它赋予了哲学新的实践意义。它对神学和作为科学基本问题的真理的客观性提出了特别的挑战。几个世纪以来,圣经和基督教对信仰的系统反映都清楚地表明,对全能上帝的信仰具有实际的性质。这就是说,信仰不能仅仅归结为知识,正如信仰不能放弃真理的问题一样。从这个意义上说,神学作为实践知识,即在信仰的基础上,一种特定的精神态度和从中流出的选择,是对人类理性、启示和生命在这一事件中的必要参与的正确理解。从基督论的角度来看,神学作为实践知识的最佳定义是约翰福音中的一句话:“我是道路,真理和生命”(若14:6)。在这样的方法中,信仰反思的实践维度只是爱-首先是作为法律的完美实现(罗马书13:10),然后是爱,即一种不放弃和痛苦的礼物。这意味着在这个问题的必要性,揭示真理的神圣三位一体,其中的关系给予和接受的爱是很难考虑的理论。正如实践知识和理论知识不应该对立一样,知识和智慧也不应该对立和分离。因为神学,作为智慧,不仅知道,而且知道它为什么知道,怎样用它所知道的去做;它不仅提出了如何生活的问题,而且还回答了这些问题。换句话说,系统地反映信仰的实践维度对于神学来说不仅是有争议的,而且是跪着工作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信