Peer Effects in Academic Research: Senders and Receivers

Clément Bosquet, P. Combes, Emeric Henry, T. Mayer
{"title":"Peer Effects in Academic Research: Senders and Receivers","authors":"Clément Bosquet, P. Combes, Emeric Henry, T. Mayer","doi":"10.1093/ej/ueac031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Using an instrument based on a national contest in France determining researchers’ location, we find evidence of peer effects in academia, when focusing on precise groups of senders (producing the spillovers) and receivers (benefiting from the spillovers), defined based on field of specialisation, gender and age. These peer effects are present even outside formal co-authorship relationships. Furthermore, the match between the characteristics of senders and receivers plays a critical role. In particular, men benefit a lot from peer effects provided by other men, while all other types of gender combinations produce spillovers twice as small. Part of the peer effects results from researchers switching research fields.","PeriodicalId":421122,"journal":{"name":"CEPR: Labour Economics (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR: Labour Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Using an instrument based on a national contest in France determining researchers’ location, we find evidence of peer effects in academia, when focusing on precise groups of senders (producing the spillovers) and receivers (benefiting from the spillovers), defined based on field of specialisation, gender and age. These peer effects are present even outside formal co-authorship relationships. Furthermore, the match between the characteristics of senders and receivers plays a critical role. In particular, men benefit a lot from peer effects provided by other men, while all other types of gender combinations produce spillovers twice as small. Part of the peer effects results from researchers switching research fields.
学术研究中的同伴效应:发送者和接收者
通过使用一种基于法国全国竞赛的工具来确定研究人员的位置,我们发现了学术界同伴效应的证据,当我们关注基于专业领域、性别和年龄定义的发送者(产生溢出效应)和接收者(从溢出效应中受益)的精确群体时。这些同伴效应甚至在正式的合作关系之外也存在。此外,发送方和接收方的特征匹配起着至关重要的作用。特别是,男性从其他男性提供的同伴效应中获益良多,而所有其他类型的性别组合产生的溢出效应则小一倍。同伴效应的部分原因是研究人员转换了研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信