EPONYMS IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE AND PAEDIATRIC DENTAL MEDICINE IN BULGARIAN AND ENGLISH

Zheleva Zlatina, G. Petkova, Vanya Ivanova, S. Petrova
{"title":"EPONYMS IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE AND PAEDIATRIC DENTAL MEDICINE IN BULGARIAN AND ENGLISH","authors":"Zheleva Zlatina, G. Petkova, Vanya Ivanova, S. Petrova","doi":"10.18524/2410-3373.2021.24.248320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Eponyms have been an inseparable part of medicine ever since the science exists. The need to name diseases and conditions after the physicians who came upon them and explored them arose (e.g., Addison’s disease, Cushing syndrome etc). This method of term formation continues to be employed even nowadays and its main advantage is that it facilitates remembering the condition. \nThe purpose of the present paper is to establish the main principles of formation of eponyms and to compare them within the Bulgarian, English and Latin terminology. Another comparison which is intended is the use of eponyms in clinical medicine and clinical paediatric dental medicine. \nBackground and motivations. The purpose of eponyms is to name diseases and conditions and to facilitate remembering. However, there are underlying principles of term formation and usage in the different fields of medicine which need to be clarified and traced. \nMethodology. The  main   methods   used   are   lexicographical   excerption   and comparative analysis. The eponyms are classified according to the manner of their formation and usage. \nThe expected results are related to the differences in the use of eponyms in the medical terminologies of Bulgarian and English clinical setting and to compare those to their source languages- Latin and ancient Greek.","PeriodicalId":408423,"journal":{"name":"Opera in onomastica","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opera in onomastica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-3373.2021.24.248320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Eponyms have been an inseparable part of medicine ever since the science exists. The need to name diseases and conditions after the physicians who came upon them and explored them arose (e.g., Addison’s disease, Cushing syndrome etc). This method of term formation continues to be employed even nowadays and its main advantage is that it facilitates remembering the condition. The purpose of the present paper is to establish the main principles of formation of eponyms and to compare them within the Bulgarian, English and Latin terminology. Another comparison which is intended is the use of eponyms in clinical medicine and clinical paediatric dental medicine. Background and motivations. The purpose of eponyms is to name diseases and conditions and to facilitate remembering. However, there are underlying principles of term formation and usage in the different fields of medicine which need to be clarified and traced. Methodology. The  main   methods   used   are   lexicographical   excerption   and comparative analysis. The eponyms are classified according to the manner of their formation and usage. The expected results are related to the differences in the use of eponyms in the medical terminologies of Bulgarian and English clinical setting and to compare those to their source languages- Latin and ancient Greek.
保加利亚语和英语医学和儿科牙科医学领域的同义词
介绍。自从医学存在以来,名字一直是医学不可分割的一部分。以发现疾病和病症并对其进行研究的医生的名字来命名疾病和病症的需求出现了(例如,艾迪生病、库欣综合征等)。这种术语形成的方法甚至在今天仍在使用,它的主要优点是便于记忆条件。本论文的目的是建立的主要原则,形成的名字,并比较他们在保加利亚语,英语和拉丁语的术语。另一个比较的目的是使用在临床医学和临床儿科牙科医学的名字。背景和动机。名字的目的是命名疾病和条件,并方便记忆。然而,在不同的医学领域,术语的形成和使用有一些基本的原则需要澄清和追查。方法。采用的主要方法是词典摘录法和比较分析法。根据其形成和使用的方式,人名被分类。预期的结果与保加利亚和英国临床环境中医学术语中同名词的使用差异有关,并将其与其源语言-拉丁语和古希腊语进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信