Misconception Analysis in The Teaching Book of High School Physics and Edupark Mifan Waterpark and Geopark Ngarai Sianok in Dynamic Fluid Material

D.I. Ansusa Putra, -. Hamdi, S. Sari, -. Hidayati, Dewi Puspa Sari
{"title":"Misconception Analysis in The Teaching Book of High School Physics and Edupark Mifan Waterpark and Geopark Ngarai Sianok in Dynamic Fluid Material","authors":"D.I. Ansusa Putra, -. Hamdi, S. Sari, -. Hidayati, Dewi Puspa Sari","doi":"10.24036/9586171074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cause of errors and misconceptions experienced by some students and students is the large number of literature or books that describe the concept inappropriately. Writing difficult equations is also a factor in students' misunderstanding. So, misconceptions must be detected as soon as possible, especially in one of the causes, namely textbooks. This study aims to determine whether there are misconceptions in high school physics textbooks and physics edupark textbooks for class XI dynamic fluid material and to find out whether there are indications of other information that have the potential to cause misconceptions in textbooks.This research was a qualitative descriptive study that provides an interpretation of the data obtained rationally and objectively. In this study, data collection techniques were carried out by literature study and interviews with a team of physicists. The data source of this research was the physics textbook of Class XI high school by Marthen Kanginan in 2016 and the edupark physics textbook, while the data was the physics concept on dynamic fluid material. Credibility and triangulation techniques were used to determine the validity / validity of the data. Based on data analysis, conclusions can be drawn. Namely, there were misconceptions in book 2, while books 1 and 3 did not have any. Apart from misconceptions, the results of identification of other information were found, namely incomplete concepts, concepts that allow misconceptions, improving images, improving formulation writing, improving sentence writing, improving notation writing. The three books studied had the same findings of other information that led to misconceptions, namely on average there were 1 improvements for each indication found","PeriodicalId":176296,"journal":{"name":"PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/9586171074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The cause of errors and misconceptions experienced by some students and students is the large number of literature or books that describe the concept inappropriately. Writing difficult equations is also a factor in students' misunderstanding. So, misconceptions must be detected as soon as possible, especially in one of the causes, namely textbooks. This study aims to determine whether there are misconceptions in high school physics textbooks and physics edupark textbooks for class XI dynamic fluid material and to find out whether there are indications of other information that have the potential to cause misconceptions in textbooks.This research was a qualitative descriptive study that provides an interpretation of the data obtained rationally and objectively. In this study, data collection techniques were carried out by literature study and interviews with a team of physicists. The data source of this research was the physics textbook of Class XI high school by Marthen Kanginan in 2016 and the edupark physics textbook, while the data was the physics concept on dynamic fluid material. Credibility and triangulation techniques were used to determine the validity / validity of the data. Based on data analysis, conclusions can be drawn. Namely, there were misconceptions in book 2, while books 1 and 3 did not have any. Apart from misconceptions, the results of identification of other information were found, namely incomplete concepts, concepts that allow misconceptions, improving images, improving formulation writing, improving sentence writing, improving notation writing. The three books studied had the same findings of other information that led to misconceptions, namely on average there were 1 improvements for each indication found
《高中物理教材》及Edupark《米凡水上公园》、《恩加莱西诺克地质公园》动态流体材料中的误区分析
一些学生和学生所经历的错误和误解的原因是大量的文献或书籍不恰当地描述了这个概念。写出难解的方程式也是造成学生误解的一个因素。因此,必须尽快发现误解,特别是在原因之一,即教科书。本研究为定性描述性研究,对所得数据进行理性客观的解释。在本研究中,数据收集技术是通过文献研究和对物理学家团队的访谈来进行的。本研究的数据源为Marthen Kanginan 2016年高中11班物理教材和edupark物理教材,数据为关于动态流体材料的物理概念。可信度和三角测量技术被用来确定数据的有效性。通过数据分析,可以得出结论。也就是说,书2中有误解,而书1和书3中没有。除了误解,我们还发现了其他信息的识别结果,即不完整的概念,允许误解的概念,改善形象,改善提法写作,改善句子写作,改善符号写作。被研究的三本书都发现了导致误解的其他信息,即平均每个发现的迹象有1个改进
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信