Analisis Perbandingan Keputusan Pembelian Produk Makeup Merek Wardah Dan Maybelline Ditinjau Dari Ekuitas Merek Pada Toko Redcanoeya Di Tenggarong

Anggi Firdha Ayunir, Erwinsyah Erwinsyah, Sugeng Raharjo
{"title":"Analisis Perbandingan Keputusan Pembelian Produk Makeup Merek Wardah Dan Maybelline Ditinjau Dari Ekuitas Merek Pada Toko Redcanoeya Di Tenggarong","authors":"Anggi Firdha Ayunir, Erwinsyah Erwinsyah, Sugeng Raharjo","doi":"10.53640/JEMI.V20I1.761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze the influence of consumer purchase decision from the elements of brand equity. The data used is primary data. Respondents who are involved on this study were 122 respondents. While method used in this study is purposive sampling. The number of independent variables studied were 4 namely brand awareness, brand association, perceived quality, brand loyalty  and with  comparison variable namely purchase decision. Data collected by spreading questionnaire and data analysis method was done through wilcoxon signed rank test to knowing there is a difference or not between two paired dependent samples, Wardah and Maybelline. Based on the results of testing the first hypothesis regarding brand awareness the results were rejected with significant value 0,052, the second hypothesis regarding the perceived quality of the results is accepted with significant value 0,000, the third hypothesis regarding the brand association results is accepted with significant value 0,000, the fourth hypothesis regarding the brand loyalty is accepted with significant value 0,000 and the fifth hypothesis regarding the results of the purchase decision is accepted with significant value 0,000. Based on the results of comparison of purchasing decisions reviewed through brand equity, Maybelline has a high value more than Wardah. This is reinforced by the values described in the table of wilcoxon signed rank test.Keywords : Brand Awareness, Brand Association, Perceived Quality, Brand Loyalty and Purchase Decision.","PeriodicalId":358148,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ekonomi & Manajemen Indonesia","volume":"352 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ekonomi & Manajemen Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53640/JEMI.V20I1.761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the influence of consumer purchase decision from the elements of brand equity. The data used is primary data. Respondents who are involved on this study were 122 respondents. While method used in this study is purposive sampling. The number of independent variables studied were 4 namely brand awareness, brand association, perceived quality, brand loyalty  and with  comparison variable namely purchase decision. Data collected by spreading questionnaire and data analysis method was done through wilcoxon signed rank test to knowing there is a difference or not between two paired dependent samples, Wardah and Maybelline. Based on the results of testing the first hypothesis regarding brand awareness the results were rejected with significant value 0,052, the second hypothesis regarding the perceived quality of the results is accepted with significant value 0,000, the third hypothesis regarding the brand association results is accepted with significant value 0,000, the fourth hypothesis regarding the brand loyalty is accepted with significant value 0,000 and the fifth hypothesis regarding the results of the purchase decision is accepted with significant value 0,000. Based on the results of comparison of purchasing decisions reviewed through brand equity, Maybelline has a high value more than Wardah. This is reinforced by the values described in the table of wilcoxon signed rank test.Keywords : Brand Awareness, Brand Association, Perceived Quality, Brand Loyalty and Purchase Decision.
根据位于腾格龙的Redcanoeya杂货店的品牌权益,对Wardah和maybeline购买产品的比较进行了分析
本研究旨在从品牌资产要素分析消费者购买决策的影响。使用的数据为原始数据。参与这项研究的受访者有122人。而本研究采用的方法是有目的抽样。自变量为品牌意识、品牌联想、感知质量、品牌忠诚度4个,比较变量为购买决策。采用问卷调查法和数据分析法收集的数据,通过wilcoxon sign rank检验,了解华达(Wardah)和美宝莲(Maybelline)两个成对依赖样本之间是否存在差异。基于测试关于品牌意识的第一个假设的结果被拒绝,显著值为0,052,关于结果的感知质量的第二个假设被接受,显著值为0,000,关于品牌联想结果的第三个假设被接受,显著值为0,000。关于品牌忠诚度的第四个假设被接受,显著值为0000;关于购买决策结果的第五个假设被接受,显著值为0000。通过品牌资产审查的采购决策对比结果显示,美宝莲的价值高于华达。wilcoxon符号秩检验表中描述的值加强了这一点。关键词:品牌意识、品牌联想、感知质量、品牌忠诚与购买决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信