Will Online Learning Become a New Norm in Higher Education?

E. Berezina, C. M. Gill, Siti Fariza Mohd Dahlan
{"title":"Will Online Learning Become a New Norm in Higher Education?","authors":"E. Berezina, C. M. Gill, Siti Fariza Mohd Dahlan","doi":"10.1145/3481056.3481086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic has been seen by some as the event that will finally make online delivery become a dominant mode in universities. This study reports the preferences of students for online teaching, collaboration, and assessment using survey data gathered after a lengthy period of full online delivery and at a time when students were free to choose conventional, online and hybrid approaches to learning, collaboration and assessment. Most previous research has explored student preferences with respect to specific courses or at the institutional level, but the present study examines students’ preferences with respect to their discipline: arts, science and technology, business, hospitality and mathematics. Analyses revealed that students prefer conventional lectures providing that recordings are made available online, but that students prefer small group teaching, collaborative work, assessment, support and other activities to be delivered conventionally. These preferences were broadly similar across students drawn from the different discipline areas, but there was also some variation between the disciplines. Overall the findings suggest that students prefer conventional on-campus teaching, learning and assessment to full online delivery.","PeriodicalId":172046,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology","volume":"351 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3481056.3481086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has been seen by some as the event that will finally make online delivery become a dominant mode in universities. This study reports the preferences of students for online teaching, collaboration, and assessment using survey data gathered after a lengthy period of full online delivery and at a time when students were free to choose conventional, online and hybrid approaches to learning, collaboration and assessment. Most previous research has explored student preferences with respect to specific courses or at the institutional level, but the present study examines students’ preferences with respect to their discipline: arts, science and technology, business, hospitality and mathematics. Analyses revealed that students prefer conventional lectures providing that recordings are made available online, but that students prefer small group teaching, collaborative work, assessment, support and other activities to be delivered conventionally. These preferences were broadly similar across students drawn from the different discipline areas, but there was also some variation between the disciplines. Overall the findings suggest that students prefer conventional on-campus teaching, learning and assessment to full online delivery.
在线学习将成为高等教育的新常态吗?
一些人认为,新冠肺炎疫情最终将使在线教学成为大学的主导模式。本研究报告了学生对在线教学、合作和评估的偏好,调查数据是在学生可以自由选择传统、在线和混合的学习、合作和评估方法之后收集的。以前的大多数研究都是在特定课程或机构层面上探索学生的偏好,但本研究考察了学生在学科方面的偏好:艺术、科学和技术、商业、酒店和数学。分析显示,学生更喜欢提供在线录音的传统讲座,但学生更喜欢传统的小组教学、协作工作、评估、支持和其他活动。这些偏好在来自不同学科领域的学生中大致相似,但学科之间也存在一些差异。总体而言,调查结果表明,学生更喜欢传统的校园教学、学习和评估,而不是完全在线交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信