Wassily Kandinsky at the Exhibition "Meisterwerke muhammedanischer Kunst" in Munich, 1910

Emily Christensen
{"title":"Wassily Kandinsky at the Exhibition \"Meisterwerke muhammedanischer Kunst\" in Munich, 1910","authors":"Emily Christensen","doi":"10.36950/manazir.2021.3.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1910, Wassily Kandinsky attended the Munich exhibition Meisterwerke muhammedanischer Kunst and subsequently wrote a review of it for the Russian literary journal Apollon. His review, which almost exclusively discussed the Persian paintings on display, provides insights into Kandinsky’s way of seeing and understanding these objects at a significant moment in his artistic development. The most compelling aspect of his review is his repeated articulation of the sense of revelation that he experienced in front of these works. Conveying a sense of revelation through his own paintings was Kandinsky’s primary goal in this period, and was a concept he struggled to formulate in his art. I argue that Kandinsky developed one of his primary artistic strategies in response to a specific practice that he had first encountered at the Meisterwerke exhibition: the Persian artist’s practice of painting hidden forms within a composition. This article looks closely at a work from the exhibition, Sleeping Rustam (attributed to Sultan Muhammad, 1515-1522), which incorporates hidden figures in its rock formations, a practice described as demanding careful and sustained scrutiny by the viewer before the faces and forms reveal themselves. Kandinsky himself wrote later that his works from 1910, “dissolved objects to a greater or lesser extent within the same picture, so that they might not all be recognized at once and so that these emotional overtones might thus be experienced gradually by the spectator, one after another”; a process that the author believes he may have adapted from Persian paintings. ","PeriodicalId":257328,"journal":{"name":"Manazir Journal","volume":"329 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manazir Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/manazir.2021.3.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1910, Wassily Kandinsky attended the Munich exhibition Meisterwerke muhammedanischer Kunst and subsequently wrote a review of it for the Russian literary journal Apollon. His review, which almost exclusively discussed the Persian paintings on display, provides insights into Kandinsky’s way of seeing and understanding these objects at a significant moment in his artistic development. The most compelling aspect of his review is his repeated articulation of the sense of revelation that he experienced in front of these works. Conveying a sense of revelation through his own paintings was Kandinsky’s primary goal in this period, and was a concept he struggled to formulate in his art. I argue that Kandinsky developed one of his primary artistic strategies in response to a specific practice that he had first encountered at the Meisterwerke exhibition: the Persian artist’s practice of painting hidden forms within a composition. This article looks closely at a work from the exhibition, Sleeping Rustam (attributed to Sultan Muhammad, 1515-1522), which incorporates hidden figures in its rock formations, a practice described as demanding careful and sustained scrutiny by the viewer before the faces and forms reveal themselves. Kandinsky himself wrote later that his works from 1910, “dissolved objects to a greater or lesser extent within the same picture, so that they might not all be recognized at once and so that these emotional overtones might thus be experienced gradually by the spectator, one after another”; a process that the author believes he may have adapted from Persian paintings. 
瓦西里·康定斯基在慕尼黑“Meisterwerke muhammedanischer Kunst”展览上,1910年
1910年,瓦西里·康定斯基(Wassily Kandinsky)参加了慕尼黑的Meisterwerke muhammedanischer Kunst展览,随后为俄罗斯文学杂志《阿波罗》(Apollon)写了一篇评论。他的评论几乎专门讨论了展出的波斯绘画,提供了康定斯基在其艺术发展的重要时刻看待和理解这些对象的方式的见解。他的评论中最引人注目的方面是他反复表达他在这些作品面前所经历的启示感。通过自己的绘画传达一种启示感是康定斯基在这一时期的主要目标,也是他在艺术中努力形成的一个概念。我认为康定斯基发展了他的主要艺术策略之一,以回应他在Meisterwerke展览上第一次遇到的具体实践:波斯艺术家在构图中绘画隐藏形式的实践。这篇文章仔细研究了展览中的一件作品《沉睡的鲁斯塔姆》(被认为是苏丹穆罕默德的作品,1515-1522),它将隐藏的人物融入了岩层中,这种做法被描述为需要观众在面部和形态显露之前仔细和持续地观察。康定斯基自己后来写道,他1910年的作品“或多或少地将物体溶解在同一幅画中,这样它们就不会立即被认出来,这样观众就可以逐渐体验到这些情感的暗示,一个接一个”;作者认为他可能是从波斯绘画中改编而来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信