Key differences between methods of measuring foreign direct investor involvement in service industries – case study of Poland

Andżelika Kuźnar
{"title":"Key differences between methods of measuring foreign direct investor involvement in service industries – case study of Poland","authors":"Andżelika Kuźnar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3894314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polish enterprises (or registered in Poland) are increasingly investing abroad, as shown by the data of the National Bank of Poland. Their investments have increased significantly since Poland’s accession to the European Union in 2004. This indicates the attractiveness of foreign markets (mainly European) for Polish companies, as well as their ability to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the freedom of capital movement in the EU. Due to the growing role of services in the economy, I investigate what part of these investments goes to services. The answer to this question seems simple, due to the availability of data on FDI, published by the central bank, but the specifics of service provision make the analysis of this phenomenon much more complex. The aim of this paper is to indicate different methods of measuring the involvement of direct investors in service industries abroad, on the example of Poland. The added value of the paper is the comparison of all these methods, as many papers use diverse sources, not always indicating the differences between them. The lack of a uniform method makes the studies de facto incomparable, although internally consistent. The involvement of Polish direct investors abroad can be analyzed either basing on the balance of payments data or on the Foreign Affiliates Trade in Services Statistics (FATS) system specially designed for the examining of trade in services. In 2019 the WTO has released one more collection useful for research on trade in services by mode of supply, namely the TISMOS (Trade in Services data by Mode of Supply) dataset. This database uses estimates, in addition to trade data from countries’ balance of payments and FATS, where data are not available. However, these are not comparable data sets because of the important methodological differences underlying their production. I outlined the key differences between the ways of collecting information on direct investment abroad in the paper and presented data for Poland","PeriodicalId":152062,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: International Development Efforts & Strategies eJournal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: International Development Efforts & Strategies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3894314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polish enterprises (or registered in Poland) are increasingly investing abroad, as shown by the data of the National Bank of Poland. Their investments have increased significantly since Poland’s accession to the European Union in 2004. This indicates the attractiveness of foreign markets (mainly European) for Polish companies, as well as their ability to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the freedom of capital movement in the EU. Due to the growing role of services in the economy, I investigate what part of these investments goes to services. The answer to this question seems simple, due to the availability of data on FDI, published by the central bank, but the specifics of service provision make the analysis of this phenomenon much more complex. The aim of this paper is to indicate different methods of measuring the involvement of direct investors in service industries abroad, on the example of Poland. The added value of the paper is the comparison of all these methods, as many papers use diverse sources, not always indicating the differences between them. The lack of a uniform method makes the studies de facto incomparable, although internally consistent. The involvement of Polish direct investors abroad can be analyzed either basing on the balance of payments data or on the Foreign Affiliates Trade in Services Statistics (FATS) system specially designed for the examining of trade in services. In 2019 the WTO has released one more collection useful for research on trade in services by mode of supply, namely the TISMOS (Trade in Services data by Mode of Supply) dataset. This database uses estimates, in addition to trade data from countries’ balance of payments and FATS, where data are not available. However, these are not comparable data sets because of the important methodological differences underlying their production. I outlined the key differences between the ways of collecting information on direct investment abroad in the paper and presented data for Poland
衡量外国直接投资者参与服务业的方法之间的主要差异——以波兰为例
波兰国家银行的数据显示,波兰企业(或在波兰注册的企业)越来越多地投资海外。自2004年波兰加入欧盟以来,他们的投资显著增加。这表明国外市场(主要是欧洲)对波兰公司的吸引力,以及他们利用欧盟资本自由流动所提供的机会的能力。由于服务业在经济中的作用越来越大,我调查了这些投资的哪一部分流向了服务业。这个问题的答案似乎很简单,因为有中央银行公布的外国直接投资数据,但服务提供的具体情况使得对这一现象的分析要复杂得多。本文旨在以波兰为例,指出衡量国外服务业直接投资者参与程度的不同方法。论文的附加值是对所有这些方法的比较,因为许多论文使用不同的来源,并不总是表明它们之间的差异。由于缺乏统一的方法,这些研究虽然在内部是一致的,但实际上是不可比较的。可以根据国际收支数据或专门为审查服务贸易而设计的外国附属公司服务贸易统计系统来分析波兰海外直接投资者的参与情况。2019年,世贸组织又发布了一个有助于研究按供给方式划分的服务贸易数据集,即服务贸易按供给方式划分数据集。该数据库除了使用来自各国国际收支和fat的贸易数据之外,还使用估计数,因为这些数据无法获得。然而,这些数据集不具有可比性,因为其生产背后的重要方法差异。我在论文中概述了收集海外直接投资信息的方式之间的主要区别,并提供了波兰的数据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信