A Simple Planning Problem for COVID-19 Lockdown

A. Calvia, Fausto Gozzi, F. Lippi, Giovanni Zanco
{"title":"A Simple Planning Problem for COVID-19 Lockdown","authors":"A. Calvia, Fausto Gozzi, F. Lippi, Giovanni Zanco","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3569911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the optimal lockdown policy for a planner who wants to control the fatalities of a pandemic while minimizing the output costs of the lockdown. We use the SIR epidemiology model and a linear economy to formalize the planner's dynamic control problem. The optimal policy depends on the fraction of infected and susceptible in the population. We parametrize the model using data on the COVID19 pandemic and the economic breadth of the lockdown. The quantitative analysis identifies the features that shape the intensity and duration of the optimal lockdown policy. Our baseline parametrization is conditional on a 1% of infected agents at the outbreak, no cure for the disease, and the possibility of testing. The optimal policy prescribes a severe lockdown beginning two weeks after the outbreak, covers 60% of the population after a month, and is gradually withdrawn covering 20% of the population after 3 months. The intensity of the lockdown depends on the gradient of the fatality rate as a function of the infected, and on the assumed value of a statistical life. The absence of testing increases the economic costs of the lockdown, and shortens the duration of the optimal lockdown which ends more abruptly. Welfare under the optimal policy with testing is higher, equivalent to a one-time payment of 2% of GDP.","PeriodicalId":438941,"journal":{"name":"CEPR: International Macroeconomics & Finance (Topic)","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"751","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR: International Macroeconomics & Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 751

Abstract

We study the optimal lockdown policy for a planner who wants to control the fatalities of a pandemic while minimizing the output costs of the lockdown. We use the SIR epidemiology model and a linear economy to formalize the planner's dynamic control problem. The optimal policy depends on the fraction of infected and susceptible in the population. We parametrize the model using data on the COVID19 pandemic and the economic breadth of the lockdown. The quantitative analysis identifies the features that shape the intensity and duration of the optimal lockdown policy. Our baseline parametrization is conditional on a 1% of infected agents at the outbreak, no cure for the disease, and the possibility of testing. The optimal policy prescribes a severe lockdown beginning two weeks after the outbreak, covers 60% of the population after a month, and is gradually withdrawn covering 20% of the population after 3 months. The intensity of the lockdown depends on the gradient of the fatality rate as a function of the infected, and on the assumed value of a statistical life. The absence of testing increases the economic costs of the lockdown, and shortens the duration of the optimal lockdown which ends more abruptly. Welfare under the optimal policy with testing is higher, equivalent to a one-time payment of 2% of GDP.
COVID-19封锁的一个简单规划问题
我们研究了一个计划者的最优封锁策略,他希望控制大流行的死亡人数,同时最小化封锁的输出成本。我们使用SIR流行病学模型和线性经济来形式化规划器的动态控制问题。最优政策取决于人群中受感染和易感人群的比例。我们使用covid - 19大流行的数据和封锁的经济广度来参数化模型。定量分析确定了影响最佳封锁政策强度和持续时间的特征。我们的基线参数化的条件是,爆发时感染病原体的比例为1%,无法治愈这种疾病,并且有可能进行检测。最优的政策是在疫情爆发后两周开始严格封锁,一个月后覆盖60%的人口,3个月后逐渐取消覆盖20%的人口。封锁的强度取决于死亡率作为受感染人数的函数的梯度,以及统计寿命的假设值。缺乏检测增加了封锁的经济成本,缩短了最佳封锁的持续时间,而最佳封锁的持续时间会更突然地结束。在有测试的最优政策下,福利更高,相当于一次性支付GDP的2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信