Antibacterial Sensitivity Profile of Bacteria Isolated from Solid Dump Waste of Hetauda Hospital, Nepal

S. Deo, Sailendra Chaudhary, Ajay Yadav
{"title":"Antibacterial Sensitivity Profile of Bacteria Isolated from Solid Dump Waste of Hetauda Hospital, Nepal","authors":"S. Deo, Sailendra Chaudhary, Ajay Yadav","doi":"10.3126/njhs.v2i2.56793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lack of knowledge and awareness about hospital waste has been a concern amid inadequate hospital waste management facilities and ineffective policies.\nObjectives: To isolate the bacteria from the waste sample collected from the different departments of the hospital and study the sensitivity profile of the isolated bacteria.\nMethod: Cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 3 months examining the solid waste of Hetauda hospital of Bagmati Province. Untreated hospital solid waste samples were collected from Hetauda hospital from different departments like general wards, ICU/HDU, Emergency, OPD, Pharmacy, Laboratories. Battery of biochemical were performed according to the guideline of the Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. At the end, sensitivity pattern of the isolates was determined by measuring the zones of inhibition with a calibrated ruler, also interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory standards institute(CLSI) criteria.\nResult: A total of 540 bacteria were isolated. Among them higher number of bacteria were isolated from the emergency department and general wards. Both gram positive and negative bacteria isolated from different wards/department has shown a higher percentage of resistant to different antibiotics; Ciprofloxacin, Ceftazidine, Cefotaxime, Gentamycin, Penicilin, piperatazobactum, imipenem, linezolid and cephalexin.\nConclusion: Antibiotic resistant to different antibiotic isolated from the hospital has shown greater public health threats. The facilities/waste management in the hospital should be properly handled and regular monitoring should be performed.","PeriodicalId":384518,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/njhs.v2i2.56793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lack of knowledge and awareness about hospital waste has been a concern amid inadequate hospital waste management facilities and ineffective policies. Objectives: To isolate the bacteria from the waste sample collected from the different departments of the hospital and study the sensitivity profile of the isolated bacteria. Method: Cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 3 months examining the solid waste of Hetauda hospital of Bagmati Province. Untreated hospital solid waste samples were collected from Hetauda hospital from different departments like general wards, ICU/HDU, Emergency, OPD, Pharmacy, Laboratories. Battery of biochemical were performed according to the guideline of the Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. At the end, sensitivity pattern of the isolates was determined by measuring the zones of inhibition with a calibrated ruler, also interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory standards institute(CLSI) criteria. Result: A total of 540 bacteria were isolated. Among them higher number of bacteria were isolated from the emergency department and general wards. Both gram positive and negative bacteria isolated from different wards/department has shown a higher percentage of resistant to different antibiotics; Ciprofloxacin, Ceftazidine, Cefotaxime, Gentamycin, Penicilin, piperatazobactum, imipenem, linezolid and cephalexin. Conclusion: Antibiotic resistant to different antibiotic isolated from the hospital has shown greater public health threats. The facilities/waste management in the hospital should be properly handled and regular monitoring should be performed.
尼泊尔Hetauda医院固体废弃物中分离细菌的抗菌敏感性分析
导言:在医院废物管理设施不足和政策无效的情况下,缺乏对医院废物的知识和认识一直是一个令人关切的问题。目的:从医院不同科室收集的废物标本中分离细菌,并研究分离细菌的敏感性。方法:对巴格马提省Hetauda医院的固体废物进行为期3个月的横断面研究。未经处理的医院固体废物样本采集于Hetauda医院普通病房、ICU/HDU、急诊科、OPD、药房、实验室等不同科室。生化试验按照Bergey 's测定细菌学手册的指导方针进行。最后,根据临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI)的标准进行解释,用标定尺测定菌株的抑制区,确定其敏感性模式。结果:共分离细菌540株。其中,急诊科和普通病房的细菌分离率较高。不同病房/科室分离的革兰氏阳性和阴性菌对不同抗生素的耐药比例均较高;环丙沙星、头孢他嗪、头孢噻肟、庆大霉素、青霉素、哌他唑巴坦、亚胺培南、利奈唑胺和头孢氨苄。结论:医院分离出的抗生素对不同种类抗生素的耐药已构成较大的公共卫生威胁。应妥善处理医院的设施/废物管理,并定期进行监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信