{"title":"Test set compaction for combinational circuits","authors":"Jau-Shien Chang, Chen-Shang Lin","doi":"10.1109/ATS.1992.224429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test set compaction for combinational circuits is studied. Two active compaction methods, forced pair-merging and essential fault pruning, are developed to reduce a given test set. Together these two methods, the compacted test size is smaller than known best results by more than 20% and is only 20% larger than the established lower bound.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":208029,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings First Asian Test Symposium (ATS `92)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"145","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings First Asian Test Symposium (ATS `92)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATS.1992.224429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145
Abstract
Test set compaction for combinational circuits is studied. Two active compaction methods, forced pair-merging and essential fault pruning, are developed to reduce a given test set. Together these two methods, the compacted test size is smaller than known best results by more than 20% and is only 20% larger than the established lower bound.<>