Analysis of socio-economic aspects of local and national organic farming markets; final report for Defra

M. Lobley, A. Butler, P. Courtney, B. Ilbery, J. Kirwan, D. Maye, C. Potter, M. Winter
{"title":"Analysis of socio-economic aspects of local and national organic farming markets; final report for Defra","authors":"M. Lobley, A. Butler, P. Courtney, B. Ilbery, J. Kirwan, D. Maye, C. Potter, M. Winter","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.90374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to take a fresh look at the nature of organic production, consumption and marketing in England and Wales in order to better assess its current and likely contribution to rural development and its ability to meet consumer expectations. Based on a mixed methodological approach the study consulted with 2,300 individuals to reveal a complex and multi-dimensional sector with a highly committed consumer base. The research aimed to describe and account for: (1)The socio-economic impacts of the organic farm supply chains on rural development; (2)The extent to which organic food delivers consumer expectations; and (3) The barriers affecting conversion to organic farming and expansion of existing organic farms. The research reported here is arguably one of the most integrated studies of organic consumption, production and marketing conducted to date. It throws new light on the nature of organic consumption, underlining both the on-going commitment of the majority of committed organic consumers and the gap in perceptions, degrees of ‘brand trust’ and price sensitivity between this group and the majority of consumers who rarely or never buy organic. While this degree of commitment suggests that recent declines in organic consumption may not be sustained and will soon hit a floor, this finding also points to difficulties, particularly in a time of recession, in enrolling new consumers into organic networks, particularly via the direct marketing channels that smaller producers are more likely to depend on. This group of producers, locally embedded and linked to consumers via short supply chains, fulfil the expectations of many organic consumers and exemplify the idea of alternative food producers. Managed by self selecting, entrepreneurial farmers, these organic producers make a valuable contribution towards employment and income generation within the local rural economy. As our broader analysis of food chains and multiplier effects across the regional and national rural economy shows, however, it is the large scale producers, concerned with the production of bulk commodities and integrated into long supply chains, that inevitably account for the main rural employment and income benefits of the organic sector, if measured in aggregate terms. While there is a good case to be made for the rural development benefits of organic farming, it is important to recognise these scale effects and their geographically uneven distribution in any policy assessment.","PeriodicalId":338433,"journal":{"name":"The research reports","volume":"362 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The research reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.90374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to take a fresh look at the nature of organic production, consumption and marketing in England and Wales in order to better assess its current and likely contribution to rural development and its ability to meet consumer expectations. Based on a mixed methodological approach the study consulted with 2,300 individuals to reveal a complex and multi-dimensional sector with a highly committed consumer base. The research aimed to describe and account for: (1)The socio-economic impacts of the organic farm supply chains on rural development; (2)The extent to which organic food delivers consumer expectations; and (3) The barriers affecting conversion to organic farming and expansion of existing organic farms. The research reported here is arguably one of the most integrated studies of organic consumption, production and marketing conducted to date. It throws new light on the nature of organic consumption, underlining both the on-going commitment of the majority of committed organic consumers and the gap in perceptions, degrees of ‘brand trust’ and price sensitivity between this group and the majority of consumers who rarely or never buy organic. While this degree of commitment suggests that recent declines in organic consumption may not be sustained and will soon hit a floor, this finding also points to difficulties, particularly in a time of recession, in enrolling new consumers into organic networks, particularly via the direct marketing channels that smaller producers are more likely to depend on. This group of producers, locally embedded and linked to consumers via short supply chains, fulfil the expectations of many organic consumers and exemplify the idea of alternative food producers. Managed by self selecting, entrepreneurial farmers, these organic producers make a valuable contribution towards employment and income generation within the local rural economy. As our broader analysis of food chains and multiplier effects across the regional and national rural economy shows, however, it is the large scale producers, concerned with the production of bulk commodities and integrated into long supply chains, that inevitably account for the main rural employment and income benefits of the organic sector, if measured in aggregate terms. While there is a good case to be made for the rural development benefits of organic farming, it is important to recognise these scale effects and their geographically uneven distribution in any policy assessment.
分析地方和国家有机农业市场的社会经济方面;Defra的最终报告
这项研究的目的是重新审视英格兰和威尔士有机生产、消费和营销的本质,以便更好地评估其对农村发展的当前和可能的贡献,以及满足消费者期望的能力。基于一种混合方法,该研究咨询了2300人,揭示了一个复杂的、多维度的行业,拥有高度忠诚的消费者基础。本研究旨在描述和解释:(1)有机农场供应链对农村发展的社会经济影响;(2)有机食品在多大程度上满足了消费者的期望;(3)影响有机农业转型和现有有机农场扩张的障碍。这里报道的研究可以说是迄今为止对有机消费、生产和营销进行的最全面的研究之一。它为有机消费的本质提供了新的视角,强调了大多数坚定的有机消费者的持续承诺,以及这一群体与大多数很少或从不购买有机产品的消费者在观念、“品牌信任”程度和价格敏感性方面的差距。虽然这种程度的承诺表明,最近有机消费的下降可能不会持续下去,很快就会触底,但这一发现也指出了困难,特别是在经济衰退时期,在有机网络中招募新的消费者,特别是通过小生产者更有可能依赖的直接营销渠道。这群生产者在当地扎根,并通过短供应链与消费者联系在一起,满足了许多有机消费者的期望,并体现了替代食品生产者的理念。这些有机生产者由自主选择的企业家农民管理,为当地农村经济的就业和创收作出了宝贵贡献。然而,正如我们对整个地区和全国农村经济的食物链和乘数效应的更广泛分析所显示的那样,如果以总量衡量,关注大宗商品生产并融入长供应链的大规模生产者不可避免地占了有机部门的主要农村就业和收入效益。虽然有机农业对农村发展的好处有很好的理由,但在任何政策评估中,认识到这些规模效应及其地理分布不均是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信