HUSSERL, HEIDEGGER AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL METHOD

Martin Okwu Onwuegbusi Ph.D
{"title":"HUSSERL, HEIDEGGER AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL METHOD","authors":"Martin Okwu Onwuegbusi Ph.D","doi":"10.53555/eijhss.v5i3.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is on Husserl’s phenomenological method; it is an attempt to show how Husserl in pursuit for a philosophy without presuppositions, established phenomenology to serve as a rigorous science of the world.  Husserl in developing phenomenology insists that its procedure has to deal only with description of its objects rather than explanations.  Phenomenology only begins after the phenomenologist has carried out transcendental phenomenological reductions, starting first with eidetic reduction through which all existential and natural attitudes are brack-eted and put out of action to yield only essences before consciousness.  This is followed by phen- omenological reduction proper, which involves a complex of reductive phases Husserl, refers to as ‘epoche’ – which involves bracketing of all historical and existential judgments regarding what is ‘given’ and even the experiencer himself. What is left after the reduction is the transcendental ego with its transcendental life. It is then possible for consciousness to begin an entirely new task of interpreting the world at this level, as a coherent system constituted by itself alone. Husserl’s Phenomenological method is contrasted with Heidegger’s phenomenological method. Heidegger strongly rejected Husserl’s bracketing of the actual world and his transcendental ego. ","PeriodicalId":109852,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v5i3.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is on Husserl’s phenomenological method; it is an attempt to show how Husserl in pursuit for a philosophy without presuppositions, established phenomenology to serve as a rigorous science of the world.  Husserl in developing phenomenology insists that its procedure has to deal only with description of its objects rather than explanations.  Phenomenology only begins after the phenomenologist has carried out transcendental phenomenological reductions, starting first with eidetic reduction through which all existential and natural attitudes are brack-eted and put out of action to yield only essences before consciousness.  This is followed by phen- omenological reduction proper, which involves a complex of reductive phases Husserl, refers to as ‘epoche’ – which involves bracketing of all historical and existential judgments regarding what is ‘given’ and even the experiencer himself. What is left after the reduction is the transcendental ego with its transcendental life. It is then possible for consciousness to begin an entirely new task of interpreting the world at this level, as a coherent system constituted by itself alone. Husserl’s Phenomenological method is contrasted with Heidegger’s phenomenological method. Heidegger strongly rejected Husserl’s bracketing of the actual world and his transcendental ego. 
胡塞尔、海德格尔与现象学方法
本文论述胡塞尔的现象学方法;它试图展示胡塞尔如何在追求一种没有预设的哲学的过程中,建立现象学,作为一门严谨的世界科学。胡塞尔在发展现象学时坚持认为,现象学的程序必须只处理对其对象的描述,而不是解释。现象学只有在现象学进行了先验的现象学还原之后才开始,首先从表象还原开始,通过这种还原,所有存在主义和自然态度都被分类,并被排除在外,只产生意识之前的本质。接下来是现象学的还原,它包括胡塞尔称之为“时代”的还原阶段的复合体,它包括所有关于“给定”的历史和存在的判断,甚至是经验者自己。还原之后剩下的是超验的自我及其超验的生命。那么意识就有可能开始一项全新的任务,在这个层面上解释世界,把它当作一个由它自己单独构成的连贯系统。胡塞尔的现象学方法与海德格尔的现象学方法进行了对比。海德格尔强烈反对胡塞尔对现实世界和他的先验自我的划分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信