Platelet rich plasma is better than corticosteroid in longterm outcome in planter fasciitis: A study in a tertiary level teaching hospital at Dhaka, Bangladesh

Md. Johurul Hoque, Muhammad Emam Zaman, Ripon Kumar Das, Mohammad Sayeed AL Mahmud, Mahbuba Khatun
{"title":"Platelet rich plasma is better than corticosteroid in longterm outcome in planter fasciitis: A study in a tertiary level teaching hospital at Dhaka, Bangladesh","authors":"Md. Johurul Hoque, Muhammad Emam Zaman, Ripon Kumar Das, Mohammad Sayeed AL Mahmud, Mahbuba Khatun","doi":"10.47648/zhswmcj.2020.v0102.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a prospective comparative study to compare the efficacy of PRP injection versus corticosteroid injection for planter fasciitis. 35 male and 25 female (Mean Age 35.5 yrs.) presenting with planter fasciitis were randomized to receive there Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection (2ml PRP with 2ml of 2% xylocaine) given by a single surgeon. Patients were assessed before (Days0) and after (Days 30, 60, 90) treatment for chronic heel pain more than 6 months. Patients where followed up 1 year to assess heel pain over the calcaneal tuberocity. In the present study of 60 patients there were 35 male and 25 female. In the present study of 60 patients the mean age was 35.5 years (Range between 35 to 65 years). Infection, rupture of plantar fascia, heel pad atrophy and neurovascular damage where not found. Five patient reported pain for unto 9 days after PRP injection. In both groups heel pain improved dramatically after treatment, but the mode of improvement different. Compared with PRP injection. Corticosteroid injection improve at a faster rate over the first 30 days and then started to decline slightly until 90 days. After PRP injection heel pain, function improve steadily and where eventually better. PRP injection and Corticosteroid injection 30 days and faster rate 60 days of both group P-Value 0.0001. Almost high grater rate 60 days, group comparison with heel pain and function of the patients. PRP was more effective over the long term follow up period then corticosteroid injection in improving heel pain and function. That’s way we recommend PRP in a first line injection treatment because it is very simple, cheap and more effective.","PeriodicalId":146386,"journal":{"name":"Z H Sikder Women’s Medical College Journal","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Z H Sikder Women’s Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/zhswmcj.2020.v0102.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a prospective comparative study to compare the efficacy of PRP injection versus corticosteroid injection for planter fasciitis. 35 male and 25 female (Mean Age 35.5 yrs.) presenting with planter fasciitis were randomized to receive there Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection (2ml PRP with 2ml of 2% xylocaine) given by a single surgeon. Patients were assessed before (Days0) and after (Days 30, 60, 90) treatment for chronic heel pain more than 6 months. Patients where followed up 1 year to assess heel pain over the calcaneal tuberocity. In the present study of 60 patients there were 35 male and 25 female. In the present study of 60 patients the mean age was 35.5 years (Range between 35 to 65 years). Infection, rupture of plantar fascia, heel pad atrophy and neurovascular damage where not found. Five patient reported pain for unto 9 days after PRP injection. In both groups heel pain improved dramatically after treatment, but the mode of improvement different. Compared with PRP injection. Corticosteroid injection improve at a faster rate over the first 30 days and then started to decline slightly until 90 days. After PRP injection heel pain, function improve steadily and where eventually better. PRP injection and Corticosteroid injection 30 days and faster rate 60 days of both group P-Value 0.0001. Almost high grater rate 60 days, group comparison with heel pain and function of the patients. PRP was more effective over the long term follow up period then corticosteroid injection in improving heel pain and function. That’s way we recommend PRP in a first line injection treatment because it is very simple, cheap and more effective.
富血小板血浆治疗种植体筋膜炎的远期疗效优于皮质类固醇:孟加拉国达卡一家三级教学医院的一项研究
这是一项前瞻性比较研究,比较PRP注射与皮质类固醇注射治疗种植体筋膜炎的疗效。35名男性和25名女性(平均年龄35.5岁)表现为种植膜炎,随机接受由一名外科医生给予的富血小板血浆(PRP)注射(2ml PRP加2ml 2%木卡因)。患者在治疗前(第50天)和治疗后(第30、60、90天)对超过6个月的慢性足跟痛进行评估。患者随访1年以评估跟骨结节的足跟疼痛。在本研究的60例患者中,男性35例,女性25例。在本研究中,60例患者的平均年龄为35.5岁(范围在35至65岁之间)。未见感染、足底筋膜破裂、足跟萎缩及神经血管损伤。5例患者在PRP注射后疼痛持续至9天。两组治疗后足跟疼痛均有明显改善,但改善方式不同。与注射PRP比较。皮质类固醇注射在前30天改善速度较快,然后开始略有下降,直到90天。注射PRP后,足跟疼痛功能稳定改善,最终好转。PRP注射组和皮质类固醇注射组30天及快速注射组60天p值为0.0001。几乎高磨率60天,组内比较患者足跟疼痛及功能。在长期随访期间,PRP比皮质类固醇注射在改善足跟疼痛和功能方面更有效。这就是我们在一线注射治疗中推荐PRP的方式,因为它非常简单,便宜且更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信