“The Legacy of the ICTY and Continuing Importance of Criminal Tribunals” - A Documentary Viewing of “What Our Fathers Did: A Nazi Legacy” & A Talk by Judge Liu Daqun

Ariana Lopez, Despina Kornilaki, Patrick Richnow, Száva Adél Tar
{"title":"“The Legacy of the ICTY and Continuing Importance of Criminal Tribunals” - A Documentary Viewing of “What Our Fathers Did: A Nazi Legacy” & A Talk by Judge Liu Daqun","authors":"Ariana Lopez, Despina Kornilaki, Patrick Richnow, Száva Adél Tar","doi":"10.37974/ALF.316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary aims to review the importance of criminal tribunals through a documentary by Philippe Sands that looks into World War II and through a discussion with Judge Liu Daqun from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The documentary provides insight into two men that were heavily involved in the Nazi regime, but managed to receive differing treatment after the war. One was found guilty during the Nuremberg Trials and the other was never tried. Their sons grew with differing views of their father’s guilt. One son outwardly believes in the guilt of his father whereas the other fails to see the guilt of his father, despite Sands’ evidence, as no tribunal ever found him guilty. This brings out the important effect a criminal tribunal may have on the beliefs of the following generation. Judge Liu Daqun follows the documentary with a discussion on the importance of the ICTY in establishing individual criminal responsibility. The discussion and the documentary viewing took place in December 15, 2017 and this commentary will provide an overview of the event.","PeriodicalId":243475,"journal":{"name":"Amsterdam Law Forum","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amsterdam Law Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37974/ALF.316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary aims to review the importance of criminal tribunals through a documentary by Philippe Sands that looks into World War II and through a discussion with Judge Liu Daqun from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The documentary provides insight into two men that were heavily involved in the Nazi regime, but managed to receive differing treatment after the war. One was found guilty during the Nuremberg Trials and the other was never tried. Their sons grew with differing views of their father’s guilt. One son outwardly believes in the guilt of his father whereas the other fails to see the guilt of his father, despite Sands’ evidence, as no tribunal ever found him guilty. This brings out the important effect a criminal tribunal may have on the beliefs of the following generation. Judge Liu Daqun follows the documentary with a discussion on the importance of the ICTY in establishing individual criminal responsibility. The discussion and the documentary viewing took place in December 15, 2017 and this commentary will provide an overview of the event.
“前南问题国际法庭的遗产与刑事法庭的持续重要性”——“我们的父辈做了什么:纳粹的遗产”纪录片回顾&刘大群法官演讲
本评论旨在通过菲利普·桑兹(Philippe Sands)拍摄的一部关于第二次世界大战的纪录片,以及与前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭(前南问题国际法庭)刘大群法官的讨论,回顾刑事法庭的重要性。这部纪录片讲述了与纳粹政权密切相关的两个人的故事,他们在战后受到了不同的待遇。其中一人在纽伦堡审判中被判有罪,另一人从未受审。他们的儿子对父亲的罪行有着不同的看法。一个儿子表面上相信他父亲有罪,而另一个却没有看到他父亲有罪,尽管桑兹有证据,因为没有法庭判他有罪。这就引出了刑事法庭可能对下一代人的信仰产生的重要影响。刘大群法官在纪录片之后讨论了前南问题国际法庭在确立个人刑事责任方面的重要性。讨论和纪录片观看于2017年12月15日举行,本评论将提供该事件的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信