Participant stakeholder evaluation as a design process

R. Giordano, David G. Bell
{"title":"Participant stakeholder evaluation as a design process","authors":"R. Giordano, David G. Bell","doi":"10.1145/355460.355472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses participant stakeholder evaluation and its use in designing an evaluative protocol for inter-firm development and sharing of web-based learning modules. Participant stakeholder evaluation involves participants as researchers who design and evaluate evaluative protocols. It has a strong link with participatory action research and collaborative inquiry methods where the line is blurred between “the researcher” and “the researched.”\nParticipatory evaluation methods were used as a method in support of system design to help define features of learning modules, define content, and to enhance usability and effectiveness in work contexts. Preliminary results strongly suggest that these techniques are successful in uncovering usability issues during the process of design, were instrumental in helping define an architecture for learning modules, help to increase user acceptance, and inform company strategy","PeriodicalId":179665,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Universal Usability","volume":"356 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Universal Usability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This paper discusses participant stakeholder evaluation and its use in designing an evaluative protocol for inter-firm development and sharing of web-based learning modules. Participant stakeholder evaluation involves participants as researchers who design and evaluate evaluative protocols. It has a strong link with participatory action research and collaborative inquiry methods where the line is blurred between “the researcher” and “the researched.” Participatory evaluation methods were used as a method in support of system design to help define features of learning modules, define content, and to enhance usability and effectiveness in work contexts. Preliminary results strongly suggest that these techniques are successful in uncovering usability issues during the process of design, were instrumental in helping define an architecture for learning modules, help to increase user acceptance, and inform company strategy
作为设计过程的参与者利益相关者评估
本文讨论了参与者利益相关者评估及其在设计企业间开发和共享基于网络的学习模块的评估协议中的应用。参与者利益相关者评估涉及参与者作为研究人员设计和评估评估协议。它与参与性行动研究和协作性调查方法有着密切的联系,在这些方法中,“研究者”和“被研究对象”之间的界限是模糊的。参与式评估方法被用作支持系统设计的方法,以帮助定义学习模块的特征,定义内容,并增强工作环境中的可用性和有效性。初步结果强烈表明,这些技术在发现设计过程中的可用性问题方面是成功的,有助于定义学习模块的体系结构,有助于提高用户接受度,并为公司战略提供信息
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信