TUHAN DAN RUNTUHNYA TEMBOK ARGUMENTASI

Putu Dana Yasa
{"title":"TUHAN DAN RUNTUHNYA TEMBOK ARGUMENTASI","authors":"Putu Dana Yasa","doi":"10.25078/sanjiwani.v13i1.997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human efforts to understand the existence of God have been proven by the emergence of various arguments about God. Philosophers and theologians have contributed their thoughts in an effort to explain God. However, it must be admitted honestly, that every argument presented still has weaknesses that directly have not been able to define God in a final way. The arguments that arise have not been able to explain God that can be universally accepted, this of course must be acknowledged because of the limitations of humans who try to explain God without limits. The arguments presented by experts are proof that God is still a big mystery that has not been revealed by humans. The existence of God is still a debate between existence and non-existence, although the evidence for its existence is undeniable.","PeriodicalId":132261,"journal":{"name":"Sanjiwani: Jurnal Filsafat","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanjiwani: Jurnal Filsafat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25078/sanjiwani.v13i1.997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human efforts to understand the existence of God have been proven by the emergence of various arguments about God. Philosophers and theologians have contributed their thoughts in an effort to explain God. However, it must be admitted honestly, that every argument presented still has weaknesses that directly have not been able to define God in a final way. The arguments that arise have not been able to explain God that can be universally accepted, this of course must be acknowledged because of the limitations of humans who try to explain God without limits. The arguments presented by experts are proof that God is still a big mystery that has not been revealed by humans. The existence of God is still a debate between existence and non-existence, although the evidence for its existence is undeniable.
耶和华和辩论的墙倒塌了
人类试图理解上帝存在的努力已经被各种关于上帝的争论所证明。哲学家和神学家在解释上帝的努力中贡献了他们的思想。然而,必须诚实地承认,提出的每一个论点仍然有弱点,不能直接地以最终的方式定义上帝。出现的争论并不能解释普遍接受的上帝,这当然必须承认,因为人类试图无限制地解释上帝的局限性。专家们提出的论点证明,上帝仍然是一个巨大的谜团,尚未被人类揭示。上帝的存在仍然是存在与不存在之间的争论,尽管它存在的证据是不可否认的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信