Practical Application of Inline Inspection Tool With Combination of Eddy Current and Deformation Technology

Liyuan Geng, Q. Feng, Jing-zhen Chang, X. Huo, Jie Qu
{"title":"Practical Application of Inline Inspection Tool With Combination of Eddy Current and Deformation Technology","authors":"Liyuan Geng, Q. Feng, Jing-zhen Chang, X. Huo, Jie Qu","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-84628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the actual process of magnetic flux leakage inline inspection, the following four problems are often encountered: 1) There are many impurities in pipelines, which seriously interfere with the results of magnetic flux leakage inline inspection; 2) Girth weld misalignment cannot be accurately detected by magnetic flux leakage inline inspection because MFL signals are complex in girth welds; 3) The minimum passage of magnetic flux leakage inline inspection tool is poor when negotiating with pipeline geometry restrictions, so in practice geometry inline inspection normally perform prior to magnetic flux leakage inline inspection to validate the tool passage risk and avoid tool stuck incident, this will lead to tremendous extra efforts, as well as expenses; 4) The magnetic flux leakage inline inspection tool is normally heavier due to mechanical design and strong magnetic attraction force with metal surface, which lead to a much higher driving/pulling force.\n To solve these problems above, this paper propose the inline inspection tool with combination of eddy current and deformation technology. This inline inspection tool has the advantage of light weight and lower friction force, which lead to a comparative lower driving/pulling force. It can detect the metal loss on the inner wall of pipelines and weld misalignment of girth welds while realizing geometry inspection.\n By comparing the inspection results with the high-resolution magnetic flux leakage inline inspection results, it is concluded that the inspection tool combined with the eddy current and deformation technology inline inspection technology can replace the high-resolution magnetic flux leakage inline inspection tool when focusing on the inner metal loss of pipe wall.","PeriodicalId":111167,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Operations, Applications, and Components; Seismic Engineering; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis (NDPD) Division","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Operations, Applications, and Components; Seismic Engineering; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis (NDPD) Division","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-84628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the actual process of magnetic flux leakage inline inspection, the following four problems are often encountered: 1) There are many impurities in pipelines, which seriously interfere with the results of magnetic flux leakage inline inspection; 2) Girth weld misalignment cannot be accurately detected by magnetic flux leakage inline inspection because MFL signals are complex in girth welds; 3) The minimum passage of magnetic flux leakage inline inspection tool is poor when negotiating with pipeline geometry restrictions, so in practice geometry inline inspection normally perform prior to magnetic flux leakage inline inspection to validate the tool passage risk and avoid tool stuck incident, this will lead to tremendous extra efforts, as well as expenses; 4) The magnetic flux leakage inline inspection tool is normally heavier due to mechanical design and strong magnetic attraction force with metal surface, which lead to a much higher driving/pulling force. To solve these problems above, this paper propose the inline inspection tool with combination of eddy current and deformation technology. This inline inspection tool has the advantage of light weight and lower friction force, which lead to a comparative lower driving/pulling force. It can detect the metal loss on the inner wall of pipelines and weld misalignment of girth welds while realizing geometry inspection. By comparing the inspection results with the high-resolution magnetic flux leakage inline inspection results, it is concluded that the inspection tool combined with the eddy current and deformation technology inline inspection technology can replace the high-resolution magnetic flux leakage inline inspection tool when focusing on the inner metal loss of pipe wall.
涡流与变形相结合的在线检测工具的实际应用
在漏磁在线检测的实际过程中,经常会遇到以下四个问题:1)管道中杂质较多,严重干扰漏磁在线检测结果;2)由于环焊缝漏磁信号复杂,漏磁在线检测无法准确检测环焊缝不对中;3)漏磁在线检测工具的最小通过量在管道几何形状的限制条件下较差,因此在实际操作中,通常在漏磁在线检测之前进行几何形状在线检测,以验证工具通过风险,避免工具卡死事件,这将导致巨大的额外工作和费用;4)漏磁在线检测工具由于机械设计和金属表面的强磁力,通常较重,导致驱动/拉力要高得多。针对上述问题,本文提出涡流与变形技术相结合的在线检测工具。该直列检测工具具有重量轻、摩擦力小的优点,因此驱动/拉力相对较低。在实现几何检测的同时,可以检测管道内壁的金属损耗和环焊缝的焊缝错位。通过将检测结果与高分辨率漏磁在线检测结果进行对比,得出检测工具结合涡流与变形技术在线检测技术可替代高分辨率漏磁在线检测工具对管壁内部金属损耗进行检测的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书