Reexamining the ethical, legal, social, and cultural implications for cochlear implants through a novel neuroethics framework

N. Prins, Rebecca Monteleone, Joana Soldado-Magraner, Joanne E. Nash, Michael J. Young, Laura Y. Cabrera
{"title":"Reexamining the ethical, legal, social, and cultural implications for cochlear implants through a novel neuroethics framework","authors":"N. Prins, Rebecca Monteleone, Joana Soldado-Magraner, Joanne E. Nash, Michael J. Young, Laura Y. Cabrera","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10226644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few decades humanity has experienced a true technological revolution. The discoveries of this Information Era have found applications in myriad domains. Most recently, there has been an explosion of new information technologies designed to directly communicate with our bodies, and most notably, our brains. These so-called neurotechnologies might fundamentally transform the way we interact with the external world, and promise to revolutionize the medical field. Neurological and psychiatric conditions have been identified as some of the most pressing public health challenges of this century, given that relatively little is known about their causes, and that they are becoming a major concern among an increasingly aging population. Therefore, there is a tremendous incentive to promote the development of more advanced neurotechnologies. However, there has not been a similar drive to analyze the implications that such technologies might have on both individuals with these disorders, their caregivers and society in general. Here, as part of the IEEE Brain Neuroethics Initiative, we present a framework to analyze issues that might arise when designing and using a wide range of medical neurotechnologies. To illustrate the utility of our framework, we apply it to one of the most established medical neurotechnologies to date, cochlear implants. We highlight a range of ethical implications on safety, wellbeing, and agency, among other factors, as well as potential legal, societal and cultural considerations. Through this case study, we exemplify the benefits of analyzing neurotechnologies using our ethical framework, and encourage neurotechnology stakeholders such as researchers, engineers, clinicians, funding agents and end users to apply it in order to guide responsible development and deployment of neurotechnologies.1Authors contributed equally and both should be recognized as first author","PeriodicalId":180420,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"463 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10226644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last few decades humanity has experienced a true technological revolution. The discoveries of this Information Era have found applications in myriad domains. Most recently, there has been an explosion of new information technologies designed to directly communicate with our bodies, and most notably, our brains. These so-called neurotechnologies might fundamentally transform the way we interact with the external world, and promise to revolutionize the medical field. Neurological and psychiatric conditions have been identified as some of the most pressing public health challenges of this century, given that relatively little is known about their causes, and that they are becoming a major concern among an increasingly aging population. Therefore, there is a tremendous incentive to promote the development of more advanced neurotechnologies. However, there has not been a similar drive to analyze the implications that such technologies might have on both individuals with these disorders, their caregivers and society in general. Here, as part of the IEEE Brain Neuroethics Initiative, we present a framework to analyze issues that might arise when designing and using a wide range of medical neurotechnologies. To illustrate the utility of our framework, we apply it to one of the most established medical neurotechnologies to date, cochlear implants. We highlight a range of ethical implications on safety, wellbeing, and agency, among other factors, as well as potential legal, societal and cultural considerations. Through this case study, we exemplify the benefits of analyzing neurotechnologies using our ethical framework, and encourage neurotechnology stakeholders such as researchers, engineers, clinicians, funding agents and end users to apply it in order to guide responsible development and deployment of neurotechnologies.1Authors contributed equally and both should be recognized as first author
通过新的神经伦理学框架重新审视人工耳蜗植入的伦理、法律、社会和文化影响
在过去的几十年里,人类经历了一场真正的技术革命。信息时代的发现已经在许多领域得到了应用。最近,新的信息技术出现了爆炸式的发展,这些技术被设计用来直接与我们的身体,尤其是我们的大脑进行交流。这些所谓的神经技术可能会从根本上改变我们与外部世界互动的方式,并有望彻底改变医疗领域。神经和精神疾病已被确定为本世纪一些最紧迫的公共卫生挑战,因为对其原因所知相对较少,而且它们正在成为日益老龄化的人口中的一个主要问题。因此,推动更先进的神经技术的发展有着巨大的动力。然而,目前还没有类似的动力来分析这些技术可能对这些疾病患者、他们的护理人员和整个社会产生的影响。在这里,作为IEEE脑神经伦理学倡议的一部分,我们提出了一个框架来分析在设计和使用广泛的医学神经技术时可能出现的问题。为了说明我们的框架的效用,我们将其应用于迄今为止最成熟的医学神经技术之一,耳蜗植入。我们强调了安全、福利和代理等因素的一系列伦理影响,以及潜在的法律、社会和文化因素。通过这个案例研究,我们举例说明了使用我们的道德框架分析神经技术的好处,并鼓励神经技术利益相关者,如研究人员、工程师、临床医生、资助代理和最终用户应用它,以指导负责任的神经技术开发和部署。作者的贡献是平等的,双方都应该被认为是第一作者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信