Management of Potential Conflicts between Pedestrians and Autonomous Vehicles

S. Anis, C. Csiszár
{"title":"Management of Potential Conflicts between Pedestrians and Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"S. Anis, C. Csiszár","doi":"10.1109/SCSP.2019.8805678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pedestrians are the most vulnerable road users. There are a lot of studies regarding the interaction of pedestrians with conventional vehicles, but the way a pedestrian interacts with Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) still needs to be explored. Therefore, this study addresses identification, prioritization, and management of conflict situation types between AVs and pedestrians. For this purpose, an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) method is applied to analyze qualitative data sets of a questionnaire survey. The factors (e.g. decision making by AVs according to varying pedestrian behavior, limitations of the road infrastructure in terms of conflict generation, etc.) that cause these conflict situations are ranked and compared. The input is taken from the key stakeholders (professionals), and the results are analyzed using multi-criteria analysis method (AHP). It has been found that the most important factor to be considered is the decision-making ability of the AVs, according to the varying pedestrian behavior. Based on the ranking of factors, mitigation measures are recommended to eradicate the effects of the factors.","PeriodicalId":135085,"journal":{"name":"2019 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCSP.2019.8805678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Pedestrians are the most vulnerable road users. There are a lot of studies regarding the interaction of pedestrians with conventional vehicles, but the way a pedestrian interacts with Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) still needs to be explored. Therefore, this study addresses identification, prioritization, and management of conflict situation types between AVs and pedestrians. For this purpose, an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) method is applied to analyze qualitative data sets of a questionnaire survey. The factors (e.g. decision making by AVs according to varying pedestrian behavior, limitations of the road infrastructure in terms of conflict generation, etc.) that cause these conflict situations are ranked and compared. The input is taken from the key stakeholders (professionals), and the results are analyzed using multi-criteria analysis method (AHP). It has been found that the most important factor to be considered is the decision-making ability of the AVs, according to the varying pedestrian behavior. Based on the ranking of factors, mitigation measures are recommended to eradicate the effects of the factors.
行人与自动驾驶汽车之间潜在冲突的管理
行人是最脆弱的道路使用者。关于行人与传统车辆互动的研究很多,但行人与自动驾驶汽车(AVs)的互动方式仍有待探索。因此,本研究旨在解决自动驾驶汽车与行人之间冲突情境类型的识别、优先排序和管理问题。为此,采用层次分析法(AHP)对问卷调查的定性数据集进行分析。对导致这些冲突的因素(如自动驾驶汽车根据不同的行人行为做出的决策,道路基础设施在冲突产生方面的限制等)进行排名和比较。输入来自关键利益相关者(专业人员),并使用多标准分析方法(AHP)分析结果。研究发现,根据不同的行人行为,自动驾驶汽车的决策能力是最重要的考虑因素。根据影响因素的排序,建议采取缓解措施,以消除这些因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信