A Household’s Power Load Response to a Change in the Electricity Pricing Scheme: A Microeconomic-Physical Approach

Walid Matar
{"title":"A Household’s Power Load Response to a Change in the Electricity Pricing Scheme: A Microeconomic-Physical Approach","authors":"Walid Matar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3330927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy economists are interested in how a change in electricity prices prompt a response by way of end-user power demand. If historical prices are low and infrequently-changing, it becomes difficult to estimate price elasticities statistically, especially in the short-run. This paper extends on a previous analysis by incorporating more demand-reducing measures within a utility maximization framework for households. The framework is informed the physical equations that govern how electricity is consumed. The measures considered are:<br><br>1. independently adjusting the thermostat set-point across seasons,<br><br>2. turning off lights, and<br><br>3. switching off consumer electronics.<br><br>We have calibrated the physical component for a dwelling in Saudi Arabia. Domestic electricity tariffs in the progressive pricing structure were partially raised in 2018. In addition to those raises, the response to other electricity pricing schemes is analyzed: time-of-use and real-time prices.<br><br>We show that for a household with a low preference for electricity, the 2018 price increases do warrant adjustment in indoor temperature in the hot summer months and lower electricity use for consumer electronics. Since we adopt a dwelling in Saudi Arabia, the response measure that is most exercised is thermostat set-point adjustments. A subdued response is found for households that have adopted higher energy efficiency, or have high preference for electricity.","PeriodicalId":204209,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Energy Politics (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Energy Politics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3330927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy economists are interested in how a change in electricity prices prompt a response by way of end-user power demand. If historical prices are low and infrequently-changing, it becomes difficult to estimate price elasticities statistically, especially in the short-run. This paper extends on a previous analysis by incorporating more demand-reducing measures within a utility maximization framework for households. The framework is informed the physical equations that govern how electricity is consumed. The measures considered are:

1. independently adjusting the thermostat set-point across seasons,

2. turning off lights, and

3. switching off consumer electronics.

We have calibrated the physical component for a dwelling in Saudi Arabia. Domestic electricity tariffs in the progressive pricing structure were partially raised in 2018. In addition to those raises, the response to other electricity pricing schemes is analyzed: time-of-use and real-time prices.

We show that for a household with a low preference for electricity, the 2018 price increases do warrant adjustment in indoor temperature in the hot summer months and lower electricity use for consumer electronics. Since we adopt a dwelling in Saudi Arabia, the response measure that is most exercised is thermostat set-point adjustments. A subdued response is found for households that have adopted higher energy efficiency, or have high preference for electricity.
家庭用电负荷对电价方案变化的响应:微观经济学-物理学方法
能源经济学家感兴趣的是,电价的变化如何通过终端用户的电力需求引发反应。如果历史价格很低且不经常变化,就很难从统计上估计价格弹性,尤其是在短期内。本文通过在家庭效用最大化框架内纳入更多减少需求的措施,扩展了先前的分析。该框架被告知控制电力消耗的物理方程。考虑的措施有:1。2.可独立调节不同季节的恒温器设定点;3.关灯;关掉消费电子产品。我们已经校准了沙特阿拉伯住宅的物理组成部分。2018年,累进电价结构中的国内电价部分上调。除了这些提高之外,还分析了对其他电价方案的反应:分时电价和实时电价。我们发现,对于用电偏好较低的家庭来说,2018年的价格上涨确实需要在炎热的夏季调整室内温度,并降低消费电子产品的用电量。由于我们采用了沙特阿拉伯的住宅,因此最常用的响应措施是恒温器的设定点调整。采用较高能源效率或对电力有较高偏好的家庭的反应较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信