Cellular antimicrobial immunity.

F M Collins
{"title":"Cellular antimicrobial immunity.","authors":"F M Collins","doi":"10.3109/10408417909101177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acquired resistance to infectious disease may be expressed by a predominantly humoral or a cellular mechanism or, more frequently, by a combination of the two. The cellular interactions which are responsible for the induction of the immune response in the skin, lung, intestinal mucosa, genitourinary tract, conjunctiva, and peritoneal cavity are discussed and the role of living or dead vaccines in the induction of acquired resistance is outlined. The host response involves three different cell types: the phagocytic cell (polymorphs or macrophages), the thymus-dependent (T) lymphocyte, and the thymus-independent (B) lymphocyte-plasma cell line. The normal unstimulated phagocytic cell is capable of killing most nonpathogenic bacteria that gain entry to the tissues. However, the presence of opsonic antibodies and activated macrophages is required to eliminate the pathogenic intracellular parasites. Such immunological activation involves the presence of sensitized T-lymphocytes in the lesion. The cellular response is also characterized by the simultaneous development of a state of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), along with the antimicrobial CMI response. A rising humoral response normally develops subsequently. Killed bacterial cells (except when incorporated into Freund's complete adjuvant) induce the humoral response without the CMI reaction so that such vaccines are not able to fully protect the host against the naturally acquired disease. With the development of cell fractionation methods as well as the identification of distinctive cell surface markers, suspensions of B- and T-cells and macrophages can now be prepared for use in increasingly sophisticated transfer and reconstitution studies. The role of the different cell types in the expression of humoral and cellular immunity has been determined, and the effect of various immunopotentiating and immunosuppressive regimens on the immune system as a whole has been evaluated quantitatively. These studies have led to an appreciation of the role played by suppressor B- and T-cells in the interplay of both humoral and cellular components of the host defense system during the development of immune tolerance, desensitization, anergy, autoimmunity, and the expression of an anamnestic immune response following reinfection.</p>","PeriodicalId":75751,"journal":{"name":"CRC critical reviews in microbiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"27-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10408417909101177","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRC critical reviews in microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10408417909101177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

Acquired resistance to infectious disease may be expressed by a predominantly humoral or a cellular mechanism or, more frequently, by a combination of the two. The cellular interactions which are responsible for the induction of the immune response in the skin, lung, intestinal mucosa, genitourinary tract, conjunctiva, and peritoneal cavity are discussed and the role of living or dead vaccines in the induction of acquired resistance is outlined. The host response involves three different cell types: the phagocytic cell (polymorphs or macrophages), the thymus-dependent (T) lymphocyte, and the thymus-independent (B) lymphocyte-plasma cell line. The normal unstimulated phagocytic cell is capable of killing most nonpathogenic bacteria that gain entry to the tissues. However, the presence of opsonic antibodies and activated macrophages is required to eliminate the pathogenic intracellular parasites. Such immunological activation involves the presence of sensitized T-lymphocytes in the lesion. The cellular response is also characterized by the simultaneous development of a state of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), along with the antimicrobial CMI response. A rising humoral response normally develops subsequently. Killed bacterial cells (except when incorporated into Freund's complete adjuvant) induce the humoral response without the CMI reaction so that such vaccines are not able to fully protect the host against the naturally acquired disease. With the development of cell fractionation methods as well as the identification of distinctive cell surface markers, suspensions of B- and T-cells and macrophages can now be prepared for use in increasingly sophisticated transfer and reconstitution studies. The role of the different cell types in the expression of humoral and cellular immunity has been determined, and the effect of various immunopotentiating and immunosuppressive regimens on the immune system as a whole has been evaluated quantitatively. These studies have led to an appreciation of the role played by suppressor B- and T-cells in the interplay of both humoral and cellular components of the host defense system during the development of immune tolerance, desensitization, anergy, autoimmunity, and the expression of an anamnestic immune response following reinfection.

细胞抗微生物免疫。
对传染病的获得性抗性可能主要通过体液或细胞机制表达,或者更常见的是通过两者的结合表达。讨论了在皮肤、肺、肠粘膜、泌尿生殖道、结膜和腹膜腔中诱导免疫反应的细胞相互作用,并概述了活疫苗或死疫苗在诱导获得性耐药中的作用。宿主反应涉及三种不同的细胞类型:吞噬细胞(多形细胞或巨噬细胞)、胸腺依赖(T)淋巴细胞和胸腺独立(B)淋巴细胞浆细胞系。正常的未受刺激的吞噬细胞能够杀死进入组织的大多数非致病性细菌。然而,需要偶声抗体和活化的巨噬细胞的存在来消除致病性细胞内寄生虫。这种免疫激活涉及病变中敏化的t淋巴细胞的存在。细胞反应的另一个特点是同时发展为延迟型超敏反应(DTH)状态,以及抗微生物CMI反应。随后通常会产生上升的体液反应。被杀死的细菌细胞(除了被纳入弗罗因德完全佐剂的情况)诱导了没有CMI反应的体液反应,因此这种疫苗不能完全保护宿主免受自然获得性疾病的侵害。随着细胞分离方法的发展以及独特细胞表面标记物的鉴定,现在可以制备B细胞、t细胞和巨噬细胞的悬浮液,用于越来越复杂的转移和重构研究。已经确定了不同类型的细胞在体液免疫和细胞免疫表达中的作用,并定量评估了各种免疫增强和免疫抑制方案对整个免疫系统的影响。这些研究使人们认识到,在免疫耐受、脱敏、能量、自身免疫的发展过程中,抑制B细胞和t细胞在宿主防御系统的体液和细胞成分的相互作用中所起的作用,以及再感染后的遗忘性免疫反应的表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信