Autonomy of Choice in a Global Classroom: Choose-your-own Adventure, Micro-credentials, and the Destruction of “Course in a Box”

Melissa McCartney
{"title":"Autonomy of Choice in a Global Classroom: Choose-your-own Adventure, Micro-credentials, and the Destruction of “Course in a Box”","authors":"Melissa McCartney","doi":"10.33422/3rd.ictle.2021.02.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Autonomy and student choice are values held by the more recent generations, and they are taking ownership of their learning in a variety of ways. It is not a surprise that students prefer different ways of learning, but students, more than ever, have greater choices in the educational marketplace for where and how they want to learn. iGen is accustomed to choosing their journey for knowledge, which is evident in the rise of the popularity of Coursera and other quick-hit education providers. If learners they choice they are presented, they can click through options until they find something they do like. This puts traditional institutions of higher education at a severe disadvantage from a customer service perspective. How then can higher educational institutions provide more choice? By building in components that students can take small portions of information have choices in how they learn, and what they learn creates student autonomy in an innovative environment where students engage in the topic. By dismantling the “course in a box,” off-the-shelf curriculum is redesigned with student-centered, student autonomy as a foundation. Micro-credentials are discussed as pathways and options for greater student autonomy.","PeriodicalId":346339,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.ictle.2021.02.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Autonomy and student choice are values held by the more recent generations, and they are taking ownership of their learning in a variety of ways. It is not a surprise that students prefer different ways of learning, but students, more than ever, have greater choices in the educational marketplace for where and how they want to learn. iGen is accustomed to choosing their journey for knowledge, which is evident in the rise of the popularity of Coursera and other quick-hit education providers. If learners they choice they are presented, they can click through options until they find something they do like. This puts traditional institutions of higher education at a severe disadvantage from a customer service perspective. How then can higher educational institutions provide more choice? By building in components that students can take small portions of information have choices in how they learn, and what they learn creates student autonomy in an innovative environment where students engage in the topic. By dismantling the “course in a box,” off-the-shelf curriculum is redesigned with student-centered, student autonomy as a foundation. Micro-credentials are discussed as pathways and options for greater student autonomy.
全球化课堂中的自主选择:选择你自己的冒险,微证书,以及“盒子里的课程”的毁灭
. 自主和学生选择是最近几代人所持有的价值观,他们正在以各种方式掌握自己的学习。学生们喜欢不同的学习方式并不奇怪,但在教育市场上,学生们比以往任何时候都有更多的选择,可以选择他们想在哪里以及如何学习。iGen习惯于选择他们的知识之旅,这一点从Coursera和其他快速走红的教育提供商的受欢迎程度的上升中显而易见。如果学习者选择展示的内容,他们可以点击选项,直到找到自己喜欢的内容。从客户服务的角度来看,这使得传统的高等教育机构处于严重的劣势。那么,高等教育机构如何提供更多的选择呢?通过构建学生可以获取一小部分信息的组件,他们可以选择如何学习,他们学习的内容在学生参与主题的创新环境中创造了学生的自主权。通过拆除“盒子里的课程”,现成的课程被重新设计,以学生为中心,以学生自主为基础。微证书被讨论为更大的学生自主权的途径和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信