Effects of task repetition with written corrective feedback on the knowledge and written accuracy of learners with different prior knowledge of the structure

Sima Khezrlou
{"title":"Effects of task repetition with written corrective feedback on the knowledge and written accuracy of learners with different\n prior knowledge of the structure","authors":"Sima Khezrlou","doi":"10.1075/resla.19054.khe","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previous task repetition studies have largely overlooked the second language learners’ development of linguistic knowledge\n as well as written accuracy. Furthermore, sufficient attention has not been paid to the role of written corrective feedback (WCF) in task\n repetition to reinforce attention to form. Moreover, studies exploring task repetition effects on learners with different prior knowledge of\n the target structure are rare. This study attempted to bridge these lacunas. Seventy-nine upper-intermediate learners in Iran were divided\n into four groups: task repetition with no feedback (TR), task repetition with metalinguistic feedback (TR+M), task repetition with direct\n feedback (TR+D), and task repetition with mixed direct metalinguistic feedback (TR+DM). All groups performed an error correction test that\n measured explicit knowledge, an elicited imitation test that tapped automatized explicit knowledge, and a picture-cued written production\n test that measured written accuracy. Participants performed a dictogloss task and received WCF before repeating the same task. Subsequently,\n they performed another dictogloss task with different content. Results revealed that the +Prior Knowledge learners in the TR+DM group gained\n explicit knowledge and proved slightly better than the TR+D regarding written accuracy. None of the groups, however, could develop\n automatized explicit knowledge.","PeriodicalId":219483,"journal":{"name":"Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.19054.khe","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Previous task repetition studies have largely overlooked the second language learners’ development of linguistic knowledge as well as written accuracy. Furthermore, sufficient attention has not been paid to the role of written corrective feedback (WCF) in task repetition to reinforce attention to form. Moreover, studies exploring task repetition effects on learners with different prior knowledge of the target structure are rare. This study attempted to bridge these lacunas. Seventy-nine upper-intermediate learners in Iran were divided into four groups: task repetition with no feedback (TR), task repetition with metalinguistic feedback (TR+M), task repetition with direct feedback (TR+D), and task repetition with mixed direct metalinguistic feedback (TR+DM). All groups performed an error correction test that measured explicit knowledge, an elicited imitation test that tapped automatized explicit knowledge, and a picture-cued written production test that measured written accuracy. Participants performed a dictogloss task and received WCF before repeating the same task. Subsequently, they performed another dictogloss task with different content. Results revealed that the +Prior Knowledge learners in the TR+DM group gained explicit knowledge and proved slightly better than the TR+D regarding written accuracy. None of the groups, however, could develop automatized explicit knowledge.
具有书面纠正反馈的任务重复对不同结构先验知识学习者的知识和写作准确性的影响
以往的任务重复研究在很大程度上忽视了第二语言学习者语言知识的发展以及写作的准确性。此外,书面纠正反馈在任务重复中的作用在加强对形式的注意方面还没有得到足够的重视。此外,研究任务重复对不同目标结构先验知识学习者的影响的研究很少。本研究试图弥补这些空白。将79名伊朗中上学习者分为无反馈任务重复组(TR)、元语言反馈任务重复组(TR+M)、直接反馈任务重复组(TR+D)和混合元语言直接反馈任务重复组(TR+DM)。所有小组都进行了一个测量显性知识的纠错测试,一个利用自动化显性知识的引出模仿测试,以及一个测量书面准确性的图片提示的书面生产测试。参与者在重复相同的任务之前完成了一项单词注释任务并获得了WCF。随后,他们又进行了另一项内容不同的辨析任务。结果显示,TR+DM组+先验知识学习者获得显性知识,在书面准确性方面略优于TR+D组。然而,没有一个小组能够开发出自动化的显性知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信