Critical Junctures and the Department of Finance: From DPS to DPER

T. Ward
{"title":"Critical Junctures and the Department of Finance: From DPS to DPER","authors":"T. Ward","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2675077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical junctures are an enduring and important concept in the study of institutions and institutional change. Despite this, the literature on the concept prompts a certain amount of definitive ambiguity around what a critical juncture is, what it relates to, and how best we should approach describing and explaining these rare instances of significant institutional change. With a view to generating greater clarity around the concept, this paper presents and utilises a renewed critical juncture framework, which incorporates Historical Institutionalist and Discursive Institutionalist concepts. The framework helps to explore the role of context, openings, institutions, ideas, agents and discourse in these significant change events. The framework is then utilised in relation to the Irish Department of Finance (DoF), which is, and has always been, a pivotal institution at the heart of the Irish system of government and public policy. But the Department’s position and influence in government has arguably been impacted to an extent by institutional tinkering over the last number of decades. One example of this relates to its Public Service Management function, which was carved away in 1973 with the establishment of the Department of the Public Service (DPS). It returned in 1987 following the disbandment of the DPS, but the function and personnel never fully re-integrated back into the DoF, leaving a less than cohesive policy actor. This, alongside other factors, led to the most recent change in 2011 with the establishment of the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER). Given the dearth of scholarly attention on the Department of Finance, the paper places some much needed focus on this key governing actor, these key junctures, and the changing Irish core executive.","PeriodicalId":342163,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2675077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical junctures are an enduring and important concept in the study of institutions and institutional change. Despite this, the literature on the concept prompts a certain amount of definitive ambiguity around what a critical juncture is, what it relates to, and how best we should approach describing and explaining these rare instances of significant institutional change. With a view to generating greater clarity around the concept, this paper presents and utilises a renewed critical juncture framework, which incorporates Historical Institutionalist and Discursive Institutionalist concepts. The framework helps to explore the role of context, openings, institutions, ideas, agents and discourse in these significant change events. The framework is then utilised in relation to the Irish Department of Finance (DoF), which is, and has always been, a pivotal institution at the heart of the Irish system of government and public policy. But the Department’s position and influence in government has arguably been impacted to an extent by institutional tinkering over the last number of decades. One example of this relates to its Public Service Management function, which was carved away in 1973 with the establishment of the Department of the Public Service (DPS). It returned in 1987 following the disbandment of the DPS, but the function and personnel never fully re-integrated back into the DoF, leaving a less than cohesive policy actor. This, alongside other factors, led to the most recent change in 2011 with the establishment of the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER). Given the dearth of scholarly attention on the Department of Finance, the paper places some much needed focus on this key governing actor, these key junctures, and the changing Irish core executive.
关键时刻和财政部门:从DPS到DPER
关键时刻是制度和制度变迁研究中一个经久不衰的重要概念。尽管如此,关于这一概念的文献在什么是关键节点,它与什么有关,以及我们应该如何最好地描述和解释这些罕见的重大制度变革的实例方面引发了一定程度的明确模糊。为了使这一概念更加清晰,本文提出并利用了一个新的关键节点框架,该框架结合了历史制度主义和话语制度主义的概念。该框架有助于探索背景、开放、制度、思想、代理人和话语在这些重大变化事件中的作用。然后将该框架用于爱尔兰财政部(DoF),该部门一直是爱尔兰政府和公共政策体系的核心关键机构。但可以说,在过去几十年里,司法部在政府中的地位和影响力在一定程度上受到了机构修修补补的影响。这方面的一个例子涉及其公共事务管理职能,该职能于1973年随着公共事务部的设立而被取消。1987年,随着DPS的解散,它又回到了DoF,但其职能和人员从未完全整合回DoF,留下了一个缺乏凝聚力的政策参与者。这与其他因素一起,导致了2011年公共支出和改革部(DPER)的成立。鉴于学术界对财政部缺乏关注,本文将重点放在了这个关键的治理角色、这些关键时刻以及不断变化的爱尔兰核心高管上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信