A Comparative Study of Vocabulary Assessment in Public and Private Sector Universities in Karachi, Pakistan

Yusra Anees
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Vocabulary Assessment in Public and Private Sector Universities in Karachi, Pakistan","authors":"Yusra Anees","doi":"10.31703/glr.2023(viii-ii).16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study evaluates 1st year English General Undergraduate (BS, B.E, and BA) semesters' examination papers and their respective aims and objectives collected from Karachi's public and private sector universities. A total of 15 papers were collected to compare vocabulary assessing practices of public and private sector universities. The research centres on checking how well the semester papers of English General assess the vocabulary knowledge compared to devised aims and objectives. The methodology preferred to conduct the study is case study methodology under the qualitative research approach's paradigm. The findings reveal that both universities' sectors test a fraction of words on a superficial level in reading and writing skills in examinations. Both universities follow the old method of testing vocabulary, which cannot guarantee communicative competence in students. However, Public sector Universities are giving more emphasis on checking vocabulary in examination papers. The study suggests revising the overall assessment criterion and course objectives related to vocabulary, which entails updating current teaching and testing practices as a whole.","PeriodicalId":365110,"journal":{"name":"Global Language Review","volume":"370 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Language Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2023(viii-ii).16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluates 1st year English General Undergraduate (BS, B.E, and BA) semesters' examination papers and their respective aims and objectives collected from Karachi's public and private sector universities. A total of 15 papers were collected to compare vocabulary assessing practices of public and private sector universities. The research centres on checking how well the semester papers of English General assess the vocabulary knowledge compared to devised aims and objectives. The methodology preferred to conduct the study is case study methodology under the qualitative research approach's paradigm. The findings reveal that both universities' sectors test a fraction of words on a superficial level in reading and writing skills in examinations. Both universities follow the old method of testing vocabulary, which cannot guarantee communicative competence in students. However, Public sector Universities are giving more emphasis on checking vocabulary in examination papers. The study suggests revising the overall assessment criterion and course objectives related to vocabulary, which entails updating current teaching and testing practices as a whole.
巴基斯坦卡拉奇公立与私立大学词汇评估比较研究
该研究评估了从卡拉奇公立和私立大学收集的第一年英语普通本科(学士、学士和学士)学期试卷及其各自的目的和目标。共收集了15篇论文,比较了公立和私立大学的词汇评估实践。研究的重点是检验英语通识学期论文与设计的目的和目标相比,对词汇知识的评估效果如何。在定性研究方法的范式下,首选的研究方法是案例研究方法。研究结果显示,这两所大学的部门在考试中都只测试了一部分肤浅的阅读和写作技能。两所大学都沿用旧的词汇测试方法,这并不能保证学生的交际能力。但是,公立大学在考卷中更加注重词汇量的检查。研究建议修改词汇相关的总体评估标准和课程目标,这需要从整体上更新当前的教学和测试实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信