PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR IPA DITINJAU DARI KEAKTIFAN SISWA

Retno Utaminingsih, Dyan Asih Pratiwi
{"title":"PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR IPA DITINJAU DARI KEAKTIFAN SISWA","authors":"Retno Utaminingsih, Dyan Asih Pratiwi","doi":"10.30738/TC.V3I1.4330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to determine the influence of ‘think pair share’ cooperative learning model on Science learning achievement as viewed from students’ activeness. This research was conducted at Selang State Elementary School, Gunung Kidul regency, academic year 2018/2019 with a population that consists of 2 classes of odd semester fourth graders, totaling 46 students. The research type is quasi experiment, students from IV-A and IV-B classes were taken as research samples. The data collection techniques used were documentation technique; test technique, and questionnaires. Test item validity was calculated using a product moment correlation formula. Test item reliability was calculated using the KR-20 formula and the questionnaire instrument using Cronbach’s alpha. The data analysis technique used was ancova test after applying requirement analysis tests which included distribution normality test, variant homogeneity test, and correlation linearity test. The research results descriptively showed that the tendency of Science learning achievement where ‘think-pair-share’ learning model was used had an average of 22.217 (very high); and the tendency of students’ learning activeness had an average of 69.78 (very high). The tendency of Science learning achievement in which expository learning model was used had an average of 18.83 (high), and the tendency of students’ learning activeness had an average of 57.609 (medium). Comparatively there was a very significant difference in students’ Science learning achievements between Selang State Elementary School Gunung Kidul fourth graders who used ‘think-pair-share’ model and those who used expository model in terms of students’ activeness (Fcount = 0.075 with p = 0.781). The average of students’ Science learning achievement scores and students’ activeness in those who used the ‘think-pair-share’ learning model are higher than those who used the expository learning model.","PeriodicalId":354269,"journal":{"name":"Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-an","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-an","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30738/TC.V3I1.4330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research aims to determine the influence of ‘think pair share’ cooperative learning model on Science learning achievement as viewed from students’ activeness. This research was conducted at Selang State Elementary School, Gunung Kidul regency, academic year 2018/2019 with a population that consists of 2 classes of odd semester fourth graders, totaling 46 students. The research type is quasi experiment, students from IV-A and IV-B classes were taken as research samples. The data collection techniques used were documentation technique; test technique, and questionnaires. Test item validity was calculated using a product moment correlation formula. Test item reliability was calculated using the KR-20 formula and the questionnaire instrument using Cronbach’s alpha. The data analysis technique used was ancova test after applying requirement analysis tests which included distribution normality test, variant homogeneity test, and correlation linearity test. The research results descriptively showed that the tendency of Science learning achievement where ‘think-pair-share’ learning model was used had an average of 22.217 (very high); and the tendency of students’ learning activeness had an average of 69.78 (very high). The tendency of Science learning achievement in which expository learning model was used had an average of 18.83 (high), and the tendency of students’ learning activeness had an average of 57.609 (medium). Comparatively there was a very significant difference in students’ Science learning achievements between Selang State Elementary School Gunung Kidul fourth graders who used ‘think-pair-share’ model and those who used expository model in terms of students’ activeness (Fcount = 0.075 with p = 0.781). The average of students’ Science learning achievement scores and students’ activeness in those who used the ‘think-pair-share’ learning model are higher than those who used the expository learning model.
对学生的活动对科学学习成绩的影响
本研究旨在从学生的积极性角度来确定“思维对分享”合作学习模式对科学学习成果的影响。本研究于2018/2019学年在Gunung Kidul县Selang州立小学进行,人口包括2个奇数学期四年级班级,共46名学生。研究类型为准实验,选取四a班和四b班的学生作为研究样本。使用的数据收集技术是文件技术;测试技术和问卷。测试项目效度采用积矩相关公式计算。测试项目信度采用KR-20公式计算,问卷量表采用Cronbach’s alpha。应用需求分析检验(分布正态性检验、变异齐性检验、相关线性检验)后,采用方差分析方法进行数据分析。描述性研究结果表明:采用“思考-结对-分享”学习模式的学生科学学习成绩倾向均值为22.217(非常高);学生的学习积极性倾向平均为69.78(非常高)。使用说明文学习模式的学生的科学学习成就倾向平均为18.83(高),学生的学习积极性倾向平均为57.609(中)。相比而言,使用“思考-配对-分享”模式的雪朗国立小学四年级学生的科学学习成绩与使用解释性模式的学生在学生的积极性方面存在非常显著的差异(Fcount = 0.075, p = 0.781)。采用“思考-结对-分享”学习模式的学生的科学学习成绩平均分和学生的活跃度均高于采用说明文学习模式的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信