Semantic and Cognitive Structure Of Emotion States Love, Lust, Infatuation, Passion

N. Lavrova
{"title":"Semantic and Cognitive Structure Of Emotion States Love, Lust, Infatuation, Passion","authors":"N. Lavrova","doi":"10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-4-26-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conceptualization of emotions, especially those which are neither universal nor elementary, is a contested area of cognitive linguistic research. The present paper investigated the semantic and conceptual structure of four emotion states of the thematic field ‘romantic relationship’: love, lust, infatuation, and passion. The specific questions asked in the paper are as follows. First, what are the similarities and dissimilarities between these emotion states? Second, in what way does the conceptualization presented in dictionaries depart from conceptualization that emerges through corpus investigation? Finally, which of the conceptual metaphors posited for emotion concepts by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson are most entrenched in the collective and individual consciousness of speakers of English? To answer these questions, the advantages of four methods were tapped into: introspection, definitional analysis, a native speaker survey and corpus study. Findings reveal that dictionary definitions of love, lust, infatuation, and passion offer an impoverished, if credible, insight into the conceptual structure of these emotions. Results are suggestive of some specific conceptual elements which should be taken account of in a classroom setting by language instructors and L2 learners and indicate which appropriate collocations are to be taken heed of by dictionary compilers. \n  \nThis article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.","PeriodicalId":202877,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistics: Cognition","volume":"260 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistics: Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-4-26-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Conceptualization of emotions, especially those which are neither universal nor elementary, is a contested area of cognitive linguistic research. The present paper investigated the semantic and conceptual structure of four emotion states of the thematic field ‘romantic relationship’: love, lust, infatuation, and passion. The specific questions asked in the paper are as follows. First, what are the similarities and dissimilarities between these emotion states? Second, in what way does the conceptualization presented in dictionaries depart from conceptualization that emerges through corpus investigation? Finally, which of the conceptual metaphors posited for emotion concepts by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson are most entrenched in the collective and individual consciousness of speakers of English? To answer these questions, the advantages of four methods were tapped into: introspection, definitional analysis, a native speaker survey and corpus study. Findings reveal that dictionary definitions of love, lust, infatuation, and passion offer an impoverished, if credible, insight into the conceptual structure of these emotions. Results are suggestive of some specific conceptual elements which should be taken account of in a classroom setting by language instructors and L2 learners and indicate which appropriate collocations are to be taken heed of by dictionary compilers.   This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
情感状态的语义与认知结构:爱、欲、迷恋、激情
情感的概念化,特别是那些既不普遍也不基本的情感概念化,是认知语言学研究中一个有争议的领域。本文研究了主题领域“浪漫关系”的四种情感状态:爱、欲望、迷恋和激情的语义和概念结构。本文提出的具体问题如下:首先,这些情绪状态之间的异同点是什么?第二,词典中呈现的概念化与语料库调查中出现的概念化有什么不同?最后,在G. Lakoff和M. Johnson提出的情感概念的概念隐喻中,哪些在英语使用者的集体和个人意识中最为根深蒂固?为了回答这些问题,我们利用了四种方法的优势:自省、定义分析、母语人士调查和语料库研究。研究结果显示,字典上对爱、欲望、迷恋和激情的定义虽然可信,但对这些情感的概念结构却提供了贫乏的见解。结果提示了语言教师和第二语言学习者在课堂环境中应该考虑的一些具体概念元素,并指出词典编纂者应注意哪些适当的搭配。本文基于知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信