THE EFFECT OF HEURISTIC STRATEGIES AND CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE VALUES OF PANCASILA ON PPKN SUBJECTS CLASS VI SD SWASTA HKBP 2 SIDORAME, MEDAN

Santy Manalu, Deny Setiawan, D. Saragi
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF HEURISTIC STRATEGIES AND CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE VALUES OF PANCASILA ON PPKN SUBJECTS CLASS VI SD SWASTA HKBP 2 SIDORAME, MEDAN","authors":"Santy Manalu, Deny Setiawan, D. Saragi","doi":"10.53768/sijel.v1i2.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine: 1) The influence of heuristic learning strategies and expository learning strategies on student learning outcomes, 2) The influence of critical thinking skills on student learning outcomes. 3) The interaction between heuristic learning strategies and critical thinking skills on student learning outcomes. This study used a quasi-experimental research method. The research was conducted from April to May 2021.The population of this study were students of class VI SDS HKBP 2 SIDORAME Medan with a total of 50 students. The sample is the VIA class with 26 students as the experimental class and the VIB class with 24 students as the control class. The data collection technique used a critical thinking ability questionnaire and a learning outcome test. The data analysis technique used two-way analysis of variance. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There are differences in learning outcomes students who were taught with heuristic learning strategies with an average value of 86.15 higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies with an average of 76.39, the results of the analysis of variance showed that the Fcount value was 3,795> the Ftable value was 3.19 and the probability value or significance of 0.08 <0.05, so that H0 is rejected; (2) There is a significant difference between student learning outcomes with high critical thinking skills and the average88,409and students who have low critical thinking skills on average 68,133. Result of analysis of variance obtained Fcount value of 90.448> Ftable value of 3.19 and significant value 0.00 <0.05, so H0 is rejected; (3) There is an interaction between heuristic learning strategies and students critical thinking abilities in improving student PPKn learning outcomes, the results of analysis of variance Fcount value of 4.134> Ftable value of 3.19 and a significance of 0.006 <0.05, so H0 is rejected.","PeriodicalId":430876,"journal":{"name":"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensei International Journal of Education and Linguistic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53768/sijel.v1i2.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine: 1) The influence of heuristic learning strategies and expository learning strategies on student learning outcomes, 2) The influence of critical thinking skills on student learning outcomes. 3) The interaction between heuristic learning strategies and critical thinking skills on student learning outcomes. This study used a quasi-experimental research method. The research was conducted from April to May 2021.The population of this study were students of class VI SDS HKBP 2 SIDORAME Medan with a total of 50 students. The sample is the VIA class with 26 students as the experimental class and the VIB class with 24 students as the control class. The data collection technique used a critical thinking ability questionnaire and a learning outcome test. The data analysis technique used two-way analysis of variance. The results of the study are as follows: (1) There are differences in learning outcomes students who were taught with heuristic learning strategies with an average value of 86.15 higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies with an average of 76.39, the results of the analysis of variance showed that the Fcount value was 3,795> the Ftable value was 3.19 and the probability value or significance of 0.08 <0.05, so that H0 is rejected; (2) There is a significant difference between student learning outcomes with high critical thinking skills and the average88,409and students who have low critical thinking skills on average 68,133. Result of analysis of variance obtained Fcount value of 90.448> Ftable value of 3.19 and significant value 0.00 <0.05, so H0 is rejected; (3) There is an interaction between heuristic learning strategies and students critical thinking abilities in improving student PPKn learning outcomes, the results of analysis of variance Fcount value of 4.134> Ftable value of 3.19 and a significance of 0.006 <0.05, so H0 is rejected.
启发式策略和批判性思维能力对PPKN科目6班学生pancasila值学习结果的影响
本研究旨在确定:启发式学习策略和说明文学习策略对学生学习成果的影响;批判性思维技能对学生学习成果的影响。3)启发式学习策略与批判性思维技能对学生学习成果的交互作用。本研究采用准实验研究方法。该研究于2021年4月至5月进行。本研究的人群为SDS HKBP 2 SIDORAME Medan六年级学生,共50名学生。样本为VIA班26人作为实验班,VIB班24人作为对照班。数据收集技术采用批判性思维能力问卷和学习成果测试。数据分析技术采用双向方差分析。研究结果如下:(1)启发式学习策略组学生的学习成果均值比说明文学习策略组学生的学习成果均值高86.15,说明文学习策略组学生的学习成果均值为76.39;方差分析结果显示,Fcount值为3795 > Ftable值为3.19,概率值或显著性值为0.08;Ftable值为3.19,显著性值为0.00;Ftable值为3.19,显著性值为0.006 <0.05,因此拒绝H0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信