Verifying LOC based functional and performance constraints

X. Chen, H. Hsieh, F. Balarin, Yosinori Watanabe
{"title":"Verifying LOC based functional and performance constraints","authors":"X. Chen, H. Hsieh, F. Balarin, Yosinori Watanabe","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2003.1252479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the era of billion-transistor design, it is critical to establish effective verification methodologies from the system level all the way down to the implementations. Assertion languages (e.g. IBM's Sugar2.0, Synopsys's OpenVera) have gained wide acceptance for specifying functional properties for automatic validation. They are, however, based on linear temporal logic (LTL), and hence have certain limitations. Logic of constraints (LOC) was introduced for specifying quantitative performance constraints, and is particularly suitable for automatic transaction level analysis. We analyze LTL and LOC, and show that they have different domains of expressiveness. Using both LTL and LOC can make the verification process more effective in the context of simulation assertion checking as well as formal verification. Through industrial case studies, we demonstrate the usefulness of this verification methodology.","PeriodicalId":344813,"journal":{"name":"Eighth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","volume":"339 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2003.1252479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the era of billion-transistor design, it is critical to establish effective verification methodologies from the system level all the way down to the implementations. Assertion languages (e.g. IBM's Sugar2.0, Synopsys's OpenVera) have gained wide acceptance for specifying functional properties for automatic validation. They are, however, based on linear temporal logic (LTL), and hence have certain limitations. Logic of constraints (LOC) was introduced for specifying quantitative performance constraints, and is particularly suitable for automatic transaction level analysis. We analyze LTL and LOC, and show that they have different domains of expressiveness. Using both LTL and LOC can make the verification process more effective in the context of simulation assertion checking as well as formal verification. Through industrial case studies, we demonstrate the usefulness of this verification methodology.
验证基于功能和性能约束的LOC
在十亿个晶体管设计的时代,从系统级一直到实现建立有效的验证方法是至关重要的。断言语言(例如IBM的Sugar2.0, Synopsys的OpenVera)在为自动验证指定功能属性方面已经获得了广泛的认可。然而,它们是基于线性时间逻辑(LTL)的,因此有一定的局限性。引入了约束逻辑(LOC)来指定定量的性能约束,特别适用于自动事务级分析。我们分析了LTL和LOC,表明它们具有不同的表达域。同时使用LTL和LOC可以使验证过程在模拟断言检查和正式验证的上下文中更有效。通过工业案例研究,我们证明了这种验证方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信