An Investigation of the Equivocal Relationship Between Daydreaming, Creativity and Well-Being

Riddhima Kamat, Joseph M. Diehl
{"title":"An Investigation of the Equivocal Relationship Between Daydreaming, Creativity and Well-Being","authors":"Riddhima Kamat, Joseph M. Diehl","doi":"10.59793/ijcp.v34i3.572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An extensive number of studies have been conducted on the relationship between daydreaming, creativity and well-being, with mixed results, nonetheless. Particularly, research has demonstrated both positive and negative effects of daydreaming on creativity and well-being, as well as of creativity on well-being. In addition, most studies have been conducted on adults. Therefore, the purpose of this survey-based study conducted in, Delhi University in May 2023 was to further explore the relationship among the aforesaid constructs on a sample of late adolescents. To this aim, 622 Indian were asked to complete three psychometrically validated scales. The following research hypotheses were proposed: H1) Daydreaming would be a statistically significant predictor of creativity; H2) Daydreaming would be a statistically significant predictor of overall distress, stress, anxiety and depression; H3) There would be a statistically significant difference in daydreaming among severity levels of stress, anxiety and depression; H4) Creativity would be a statistically significant predictor of overall distress, stress, anxiety and depression; and H5) There would be a statistically significant difference in creativity among severity levels of stress, anxiety and depression. Results showed that daydreaming was not a statistically significant predictor of creativity, but greater daydreaming was related to higher distress, stress, anxiety and depression. Furthermore, participants with higher creativity experienced greater anxiety. Nevertheless, creativity was not a statistically significant predictor of distress, stress and depression. Finally, participants with extremely severe depression displayed lower creativity than those with moderate depression. Further research is advised before practical implications are recommended.","PeriodicalId":134500,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal Of Clinical Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal Of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59793/ijcp.v34i3.572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An extensive number of studies have been conducted on the relationship between daydreaming, creativity and well-being, with mixed results, nonetheless. Particularly, research has demonstrated both positive and negative effects of daydreaming on creativity and well-being, as well as of creativity on well-being. In addition, most studies have been conducted on adults. Therefore, the purpose of this survey-based study conducted in, Delhi University in May 2023 was to further explore the relationship among the aforesaid constructs on a sample of late adolescents. To this aim, 622 Indian were asked to complete three psychometrically validated scales. The following research hypotheses were proposed: H1) Daydreaming would be a statistically significant predictor of creativity; H2) Daydreaming would be a statistically significant predictor of overall distress, stress, anxiety and depression; H3) There would be a statistically significant difference in daydreaming among severity levels of stress, anxiety and depression; H4) Creativity would be a statistically significant predictor of overall distress, stress, anxiety and depression; and H5) There would be a statistically significant difference in creativity among severity levels of stress, anxiety and depression. Results showed that daydreaming was not a statistically significant predictor of creativity, but greater daydreaming was related to higher distress, stress, anxiety and depression. Furthermore, participants with higher creativity experienced greater anxiety. Nevertheless, creativity was not a statistically significant predictor of distress, stress and depression. Finally, participants with extremely severe depression displayed lower creativity than those with moderate depression. Further research is advised before practical implications are recommended.
白日梦、创造力和幸福感之间的模糊关系研究
关于白日梦、创造力和幸福感之间的关系,已经进行了大量的研究,然而结果却喜忧参半。特别是,研究已经证明了白日梦对创造力和幸福感的积极和消极影响,以及创造力对幸福感的积极和消极影响。此外,大多数研究都是在成年人身上进行的。因此,这项基于调查的研究于2023年5月在德里大学进行,目的是进一步探讨上述构念在晚期青少年样本中的关系。为此目的,622名印度人被要求完成三个经心理测量学验证的量表。本文提出以下研究假设:H1)白日梦对创造力有显著的预测作用;H2)白日梦在统计上是整体痛苦、压力、焦虑和抑郁的显著预测因子;H3)压力、焦虑和抑郁严重程度的患者在白日梦方面存在显著差异;H4)创造力是整体痛苦、压力、焦虑和抑郁的统计显著预测因子;和H5)在压力、焦虑和抑郁的严重程度之间,创造力有统计学上的显著差异。结果显示,白日做梦并不是一个统计上显著的创造力预测指标,但白日做梦越多,痛苦、压力、焦虑和抑郁程度就越高。此外,创造力较高的参与者经历了更大的焦虑。然而,在统计上,创造力并不是痛苦、压力和抑郁的显著预测因素。最后,极度严重抑郁的参与者比中度抑郁的参与者表现出更低的创造力。建议在提出实际影响之前进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信