HPLC/ELSD DETERMINATION AND VALIDATION OF ALPHA LIPOIC ACID AND SUCRALOSE IN BULK AND IN THEIR PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORMS

Nourhan M. Abdelbarey, M. Mabrouk, Miranda F. Kamal
{"title":"HPLC/ELSD DETERMINATION AND VALIDATION OF ALPHA LIPOIC ACID AND SUCRALOSE IN BULK AND IN THEIR PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORMS","authors":"Nourhan M. Abdelbarey, M. Mabrouk, Miranda F. Kamal","doi":"10.21608/JAMPR.2021.63273.1015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate, sensitive, robust and direct isocratic Reversed Phase-HPLC methods, using Evaporative Light Scattering Detector, (ELSD), had been developed and fully validated for the detection and quantification of two non-chromophoric nutraceuticals; Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) and Sucralose (SUC). Chromatographic separation was achieved using C18 Zoprax, 5 μm, 15 cm column for both compounds. For ALA, mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile: 0.1 M acetic acid (60:40, v/v), adjusted at pH 2.5, with 0.6 mL/min flow rate. For SUC, acetonitrile: deionized water (70:30, v/v) with 1 mL/min flow rate was used. Temperatures of drift tube, column, and spray chamber have been set to be 40°C and 30°C respectively during both assays. All varying chromatographic parameters were studied carefully. ALA and SUC had eluted at 4.81±0.02 min and 1.70±0.01 min, respectively. The obtained exponential ELSD responses, for the two developed methods, were linearly modeled using logarithmic transformation. Good Linearities had been achieved over the concentration ranges of 100-750 ppm and 16-500 ppm for ALA and SUC estimation respectively. The suggested methods disclosed excellent precision and accuracy levels. All validation parameters were fulfilled according to the USP elements and ICH guidelines. Satisfactory percentages of recovery (>97%) resulted upon methods application for the assay of each dietary supplement in its pharmaceutical formulation. Comparative statistical study was conducted between the proposed HPLC/ELSD methods and the reported HPLC/UV method for ALA and reported HPTLC method for SUC. Student’s t-tests and F-variance ratios for both methods had resulted in satisfactory values.","PeriodicalId":130435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Medical and Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Medical and Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/JAMPR.2021.63273.1015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate, sensitive, robust and direct isocratic Reversed Phase-HPLC methods, using Evaporative Light Scattering Detector, (ELSD), had been developed and fully validated for the detection and quantification of two non-chromophoric nutraceuticals; Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) and Sucralose (SUC). Chromatographic separation was achieved using C18 Zoprax, 5 μm, 15 cm column for both compounds. For ALA, mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile: 0.1 M acetic acid (60:40, v/v), adjusted at pH 2.5, with 0.6 mL/min flow rate. For SUC, acetonitrile: deionized water (70:30, v/v) with 1 mL/min flow rate was used. Temperatures of drift tube, column, and spray chamber have been set to be 40°C and 30°C respectively during both assays. All varying chromatographic parameters were studied carefully. ALA and SUC had eluted at 4.81±0.02 min and 1.70±0.01 min, respectively. The obtained exponential ELSD responses, for the two developed methods, were linearly modeled using logarithmic transformation. Good Linearities had been achieved over the concentration ranges of 100-750 ppm and 16-500 ppm for ALA and SUC estimation respectively. The suggested methods disclosed excellent precision and accuracy levels. All validation parameters were fulfilled according to the USP elements and ICH guidelines. Satisfactory percentages of recovery (>97%) resulted upon methods application for the assay of each dietary supplement in its pharmaceutical formulation. Comparative statistical study was conducted between the proposed HPLC/ELSD methods and the reported HPLC/UV method for ALA and reported HPTLC method for SUC. Student’s t-tests and F-variance ratios for both methods had resulted in satisfactory values.
α硫辛酸和三氯蔗糖原料药和制剂的Hplc / elsd测定和验证
利用蒸发光散射检测器(ELSD)建立了准确、灵敏、稳健、直接的等容反相高效液相色谱(hplc)方法,并对两种非显色性营养保健品的检测和定量进行了充分验证;α硫辛酸(ALA)和三氯蔗糖(SUC)。用C18 Zoprax, 5 μm, 15 cm色谱柱对两种化合物进行分离。对于ALA,流动相为乙腈:0.1 M乙酸(60:40,v/v),调节pH为2.5,流速为0.6 mL/min。SUC采用乙腈:去离子水(70:30,v/v),流速为1 mL/min。漂移管、色谱柱和喷雾室的温度分别设置为40°C和30°C。仔细研究了各种色谱参数。ALA和SUC的洗脱时间分别为4.81±0.02 min和1.70±0.01 min。对于这两种方法得到的指数型ELSD响应,采用对数变换进行线性建模。ALA和SUC分别在100-750 ppm和16-500 ppm的浓度范围内获得了良好的线性估计。所建议的方法具有优良的精密度和准确度。所有验证参数均符合USP要素和ICH指南。对每种膳食补充剂在其制剂中的测定方法应用后,回收率达到满意的百分比(>97%)。采用HPLC/ELSD方法与文献报道的ALA HPLC/UV法和SUC HPLC/ tlc法进行对比统计研究。两种方法的学生t检验和f方差比结果都令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信